Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: matthew fuller

...and there should not have been any bailout, but there was. As soon as our congressidiots gave AIG the money, it became AIG’s money. That is why there should have been specific rules against bonuses. But there weren’t because Chris Dodd specifically wrote it out of the bill.

We have to hold the dems responsible for this. No matter how angry we are at AIG, the dems did this on purpose.


43 posted on 03/18/2009 9:48:04 PM PDT by Tex Pete (Obama for Change: from our pockets, our piggy banks, and our couch cushions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Tex Pete

I agree with almost all of your statement, there should have been NO bailout, but since there was, I don’t know if there were any conditions or restrictions or not- so it may have been given for a specific purpose (or not), and yes, it does seem to be a PLAN on the part of the Obamassa to allow AIG to get away with this. And yes, the dims did this on purpose, after having been shown the way by GWB. A pox on both their houses.


45 posted on 03/18/2009 10:00:37 PM PDT by matthew fuller (Coming Soon: DJIA 3500 (03 07 2009).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson