[worst-case scenario]

Yes. I understand your argument.

You still haven’t explained how the encouragement of homosexuality would result in a lower abortion rate. The article states that there are more live births, in part because fewer women are choosing to have abortions.

I guess I can’t see why someone pushing a “homosexual agenda” would help depress abortion levels, thus resulting in more pregnancies being brought to term. You say yourself that the elites want more homosexuality and MORE abortions, not fewer.

What we actually have is fewer. So the plan of the elites that you argue exits is failing.

[donna]

The article states that there are more live births, in part because fewer women are choosing to have abortions.

Those are anchor babies.

If there are more homosexuals, there are less babies, less abortions.

(Don't forget the sterility from sexually transmitted diseases - less babies, less abortions.)