[metmom]

Yep, no biological discoveries, no advances in biology, and no study of living organisms could ever occur without the “basic cornerstone” of assuming that man evolved from primordial goo.

Sure, like no progress in biology was ever made until Darwin out forth his theory, which wasn't even widely accepted for some time.

I guess Mendel and Pasteur just didn't know what they were doing, did they?

[MrB]

Someone’s reply to my sarcastic post was that

biology without Darwinism is just a collection of “random facts” with no cohesiveness.

First of all, that’s nonsense, as you’ve pointed out.

Second of all, I would challenge anyone that tries to hold this position to give me an example of a discovery that couldn’t have been made if approached from the mindset of “let’s try to figure out how & why God created this structure or system in this manner”
as opposed to “let’s see how/why natural selection produced this system or structure”.

I doubt that I could get an honest analysis out of a Darwinist, however, just like you can’t ask a cultist to logically analyze his cult beliefs.