Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Stimulus Bill Explicitly Grants AIG the Legal Right to Give Unlimited Bonuses
ButAsForMe.com ^ | 03/17/09 | ButAsForMe

Posted on 03/17/2009 10:44:34 AM PDT by wrrock

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last
To: randog

0 ne

B ad

A ss

M istake

A merica


21 posted on 03/17/2009 10:52:57 AM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bronxboy

LLORT

THIS IS THE FED you Liberal SCUM... go get it from your UAW MASTERS
22 posted on 03/17/2009 10:53:21 AM PDT by gwilhelm56 (My 2nd amendment protects my 1st amendment... I carry a GUN because I can't Carry a SOLDIER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bronxboy

“Bills of attainder, ex post facto laws, and laws impairing the obligations of contracts, are contrary to the first principles of the social compact, and to every principle of sound legislation. ... The sober people of America are weary of the fluctuating policy which has directed the public councils. They have seen with regret and indignation that sudden changes and legislative interferences, in cases affecting personal rights, become jobs in the hands of enterprising and influential speculators, and snares to the more-industrious and less-informed part of the community.”
James Madison, Federalist Number 44, 1788.


23 posted on 03/17/2009 10:53:50 AM PDT by keepitreal (Obama brings change: an international crisis (terrorism) within 6 months)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

The sheer incompetence of the now failing obama regime is on view for all to see, or at least for those who have eyes to see.

Soon even selective blindness cannot be an excuse, as the stench arising from this corruption will become obvious to everybody, even the steadfast and staunch defenders of the faith in the worship of the Obamination.

Corrupt AND incompetent.


24 posted on 03/17/2009 10:53:51 AM PDT by alloysteel (Obama was lying, your rights are dying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bronxboy
The stimulus bill has nothing to do with this...the fed gave AIG the money

_______________________________

Wrong. AIG received $152 billion from TARP monies. The above referenced section refers specifically to companies that received TARP monies.

Do a little homework.

25 posted on 03/17/2009 10:54:12 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

Obama does a poor job of feigning righteous indignation. There is nothing righteous in him.


26 posted on 03/17/2009 10:55:35 AM PDT by Hoodat (For the weapons of our warfare are mighty in God for pulling down strongholds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bronxboy

Wrong. Employment contracts ase sacred PRIVATE payroll documents and not Public records no matter how much $$ the Gvmt plew on AIG.


27 posted on 03/17/2009 10:56:40 AM PDT by noname07718 (Freedom is never more than one generation from extinction-Ronald Reagan 1993)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wrrock
dodd authored the amendment because AIG gave him more money in 2008 than any other corrupt dim... over $113,000 according to Rush.

LLS

28 posted on 03/17/2009 10:57:53 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (hussein will NEVER be my President... NEVER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

But, that kind of thinking is what the MSM is promoting. Emotion and passion to trump law.


29 posted on 03/17/2009 10:58:48 AM PDT by noname07718 (Freedom is never more than one generation from extinction-Ronald Reagan 1993)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NEMDF

Fox has been hitting this all day. Prolly be the O’Reilly’s talking points and Beck’s The One Thing tonite.


30 posted on 03/17/2009 10:59:32 AM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal

Madison would not defend contracts that are part and parcel of a scheme of fraud. The real problem here is that the government is unwilling to declare that the business of AIG was a fraudulent Ponzi scheme, as that would require far more wide-ranging remedies beyond merely setting aside the bonus contracts. It might, gasp, actually address the underlying problems . . .


31 posted on 03/17/2009 10:59:42 AM PDT by Buchal ("Two wings of the same bird of prey . . .")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: noname07718
Fox Business is all over this.

Separately, Sen. Dodd was AIG’s largest single recipient of campaign donations during the 2008 election cycle with $103,100, according to opensecrets.org. http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/industries/finance/dodd-cracks-aig---time/

32 posted on 03/17/2009 11:01:33 AM PDT by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Buchal
Madison would not defend contracts that are part and parcel of a scheme of fraud.

_________________________________

Please...how do you know that all of the employees covered by these retention contracts are involved in a criminal conspiracy to defraud? And, what was the fraud?

Please detail how the AIG mortgage backed derivative failures are a Ponzi scheme. I bet you can't.

33 posted on 03/17/2009 11:04:07 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Buchal

I sincerely doubt that you could prove fraud. Even if you could, you would have to involve these EMPLOYMENT Payroll records in the Fraud. You can’t declare them as instruments of fraud without satisfying the law. I would fight the release of my personal employment compensation information to the public.


34 posted on 03/17/2009 11:04:19 AM PDT by noname07718 (Freedom is never more than one generation from extinction-Ronald Reagan 1993)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

The issue with executive bonuses is a smoke screen.

Congress is wholly to blame for this fiasco and they’re trying to pass the buck.

You and I didn’t hire AIG of Citi or anyone else to watch out for where and how our tax dollars got distributed; we hired congress to do that job and THEY screwed up.

DON’T buy in to this BS. Put the blame where it belongs and make real criminals pay.


35 posted on 03/17/2009 11:04:41 AM PDT by Tucsonican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

Now please force schmucky shumer to read THIS in front of the cameras.


36 posted on 03/17/2009 11:04:55 AM PDT by jackv (Just shakin' my head!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buchal
AIG was NOT a “ponzi” scheme.

AIG has not even been accused of any crimes.

Words mean things, and you should be aware that YOUR credibility, on these threads, depends on using words with some degree of care.

Yes, some people at AIG did some dumb things -— but again, the financial melt down was caused by sub-prime mortgages, sub-prime mortgages were pretty much INVENTED by Democrats.

The AIG problem was created by Credit Default Swaps on bad mortgages.

Credit Default Swaps, which would not be possible, had not the Democrats INVENTED, and REQUIRED the sub prime mortgages, in the first place!

Origination.

This mess was started at mortgage origination!

37 posted on 03/17/2009 11:05:48 AM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

There are many schemes of fraud that are not Ponzi. I didn’t see “Ponzi” in his post.


38 posted on 03/17/2009 11:05:54 AM PDT by noname07718 (Freedom is never more than one generation from extinction-Ronald Reagan 1993)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

Hey—it’s not their fault! No one actually expected them to read and understand a bill before passing it, right? :)


39 posted on 03/17/2009 11:06:24 AM PDT by Unlikely Hero ("Time is a wonderful teacher; unfortunately, it kills all its pupils." --Berlioz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noname07718
There are many schemes of fraud that are not Ponzi. I didn’t see “Ponzi” in his post.

__________________________________________

Look again.

40 posted on 03/17/2009 11:07:13 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson