Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Proud_USA_Republican

I am not joking. It is a waste of valuable funding that should go elsewhere to more promising programs or current needs.

I don’t know a single AF pilot who believes men will be in planes during the next fight. UAV are the future platform.

Remember the military is a government bureaucracy as well.

Our nation’s defense doesn’t need a military-industrial complex feeding off the tax-payer trough.


66 posted on 03/17/2009 5:52:10 AM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: 1010RD
Our nation’s defense doesn’t need a military-industrial complex feeding off the tax-payer trough.

I'll bet you read that in one of Ike's speeches didn't you?
70 posted on 03/17/2009 5:55:09 AM PDT by mkjessup (You're either with our Constitution, or you are with TKU ("The Kenyan Usurper"). CHOOSE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: 1010RD

Your yapping on the old “military industrial complex” was already tried by the hippies in the 60s. Why don’t you take it to DU.


71 posted on 03/17/2009 5:56:51 AM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: 1010RD
Our nation’s defense doesn’t need a military-industrial complex feeding off the tax-payer trough.

It does if you want to continue having the next generation of defense technology developed. Of course if you are satisfied having the Russians and Chinese, and the North Koreans, catch and surpass our weapons technology then your argument (which pretty much matches that of Carter and clinton) makes a lot of sense.

125 posted on 03/17/2009 8:51:09 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: 1010RD
Our nation’s defense doesn’t need a military-industrial complex feeding off the tax-payer trough.

Our nation's defense needs a military. It needs industry to supply the military. The source of payment is the "tax-payer trough."

While it is always appropriate to cut waste and fat from any large budget, blanket statements like the one you made are idiotic.

130 posted on 03/17/2009 9:08:51 AM PDT by San Jacinto (gorebull warming -- the Socialists' Shortcut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: 1010RD
My step father who still holds the second most hours in the air in the Air Force has many medals including the Distinguished Flying Cross. His position is that you will always need a human to make a discussion. He agrees the UAV's do have their place but not as the main defense.

also the F15's are getting old the 'A' frame can not fly much longer and it would not be cost effective to rebuild them. So we need a fighter and the only fighter at the moment that can replace the F15's are the F22.

144 posted on 03/17/2009 10:10:45 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: 1010RD
I don’t know a single AF pilot who believes men will be in planes during the next fight.

I know a lot.

176 posted on 03/17/2009 11:21:52 AM PDT by SIDENET (President Obama's teleprompter has issued a stern warning to corporate executives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: 1010RD
I don’t know a single AF pilot who believes men will be in planes during the next fight.

How many AF pilots do you know?

When do you forecast the "next fight"?

183 posted on 03/17/2009 11:46:05 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson