[Servant of the Cross]

You did a similar thing (which you did retract later) regarding characterizing conservatism as a "white male strategy". However, with the second paragraph in this post, you return with additional shots voicing a liberal's (wrong) stereotype of conservatism.

How do you respond to MrB's point that there is a great difference between appealing to married women versus single/divorced women? "Women" are not a uniform voting block.

[MrB]

I liked someone else’s response to

“angry white male” -—

How about the “bitter single female”?

[Evoter]

Servant Cross, You are correct on the first point, I did in fact do what I argue against, a mistake on my part. My point was that the sterotypes exist and simply wishing them away won’t change them. It takes overt action to change perceptions.

re: MrB’s point about women, that is a good observation on his part, the question, how do you appeal to both.

I go back to my yet un-posted response re: the contract with America. You give them a real choice, something clear, concise and specific. Right now the brutal truth is we lack that message beyond those already highly invested. You don’t convert people speaking to those already converted, you must find a vehicle that makes the message easy to understand to those on the outside looking in.