Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: george76; ColdWater
We have a serious problem with red-light runners here; so I would welcome tighter enforcement. However, if red-light cameras are bought in **; the levels of the fines should be reduced (especially when they're as high as in Sacramento!).

Fines are meant to serve as a deterrent. They are set high enough to get broad compliance; even if only a small percentage of offenders are caught. When you make it virtually certain that offenders (or innocent registered car owners) get caught — there's no justification for keeping the fine so high.

Any amount of a fine higher than necessary to achieve compliance with the law; is simply a cash grab.

** (Don't get me started on the horrors of becoming a surveillance society.)

18 posted on 03/15/2009 1:51:06 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
Fines are meant to serve as a deterrent.

Mostly, fines are a source of revenue. Since CA has gotten into the revenue problems recently, the number of cars pulled over has doubled. Typically, cops stage themselves where it is easiest to get a violation, not where the violations would be the most dangerous.

Back when the limit was 55, AZ cops would stage traps with plans way out in the desert while on the interstate through town, the chief of police was explaining to people why they were not ticketing speeders because those callers did not understand traffic flow! Duh ...

51 posted on 03/15/2009 7:23:35 PM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson