Libs are just a little slow on the uptake...
1 posted on
03/15/2009 8:54:53 AM PDT by
Nachum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: SumProVita; HardStarboard; BradyLS; Ernest_at_the_Beach; dervish; Twotone; Free ThinkerNY; ...
2 posted on
03/15/2009 8:55:34 AM PDT by
Nachum
(the complete list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: Nachum
obama knows EXACTLY what he is doing. He and his wifey want this country to fail.
To: Nachum
We have put someone who has ZER0 understanding of market economics, in charge of the world's largest market economy.
This cannot end happily.
Obamunism
5 posted on
03/15/2009 8:59:28 AM PDT by
Bon mots
To: Nachum
I think they dont know what they are doing. However, they are ideological leftists who secretly hate this country.
To: Nachum
“Do you think they know what they’re doing?”Ledt me see a manchild gets in office and you have to ask that question your righr about the Liba being slow on the uptake yet some times they never get it Carter,Clinton and now obama.
8 posted on
03/15/2009 9:00:26 AM PDT by
Vaduz
To: Nachum
Well, at least America showed itself and the world that it isn't racist.
Now let's impeach this dud and find someone who knows how to run this country.
To: Nachum
Of course this isn’t the least bit surprising given the fact that Obama doesn’t have any sort of executive experience or any experience in the private sector whatsoever. And, given the fact that this man is a committed radical and socialist, no one should be surprised that he is enacting socialist policies that harm the economy. To Obama, ideology is more important than doing the right thing, if he even knows what the right thing is.
To: Nachum
“Do you think they know what they’re doing?”
They know exactly what they are doing. They are putting ideology above all else which is exactly what I’d expect from and Obama Admin.
To: Nachum
“Stand Up Chuck!”
Yeah, I’d say they’re a little weak.
14 posted on
03/15/2009 9:05:25 AM PDT by
Fireone
(Prosecute all who voted for the illegal stimulus fiasco.)
To: Nachum
17 posted on
03/15/2009 9:06:55 AM PDT by
kanawa
(Trust in God and hunker down, we're in for a ride on the Crazy Train)
To: Nachum
Bingo! Incompetence that gives cluelessness a bad name.
18 posted on
03/15/2009 9:07:00 AM PDT by
StAntKnee
(StAntKnee, if you would intercede on behalf of . . .)
To: Nachum
And in an absolute jaw-dropper, he told business leaders, "I don't like the idea of spending more government money, nor am I interested in expanding government's role." It's not the government's money, it's taxpayer money. And Obanana is completely lying about his intentions.
19 posted on
03/15/2009 9:09:00 AM PDT by
Reeses
(Leftism is powered by the evil force of envy.)
To: Nachum
To: Nachum
Yeah really. All of us knew that more than a year ago.
To: Nachum
My reply to the excerpt on the top of the thread:
“No s*** Sherlock.”
27 posted on
03/15/2009 9:15:44 AM PDT by
Wacka
To: Nachum
No one with a brain ever doubted Obama’s administration would be incompetent. The question was, would it be “Clueless Blonde” incompetent or “The Three Stooges” incompetent.
32 posted on
03/15/2009 9:43:35 AM PDT by
Psycho_Bunny
(ALSO SPRACH ZEROTHUSTRA)
To: Nachum
Incompetence?
No worry, true dat.
33 posted on
03/15/2009 9:45:55 AM PDT by
Paladin2
(No, pundits strongly believe that the proper solution is more dilution.)
To: Nachum
Interesting article and good summation:
Which brings us to the heart of the matter: the doubts about Obama himself. His famous eloquence is wearing thin through daily exposure and because his actions are often disconnected from his words. His lack of administrative experience is showing.
His promises and policies contradict each other often enough that evidence of hypocrisy is ceasing to be news. Remember the pledges about bipartisanship and high ethics? They're so last year.
The beat goes on. Last week, Obama brazenly gave a speech about earmark reform just after he quietly signed a $410 billion spending bill that had about 9,000 earmarks in it. He denounced Bush's habit of disregarding pieces of laws he didn't like, so-called signing statements, then issued one himself.
And in an absolute jaw-dropper, he told business leaders, "I don't like the idea of spending more government money, nor am I interested in expanding government's role."
No wonder Americans are confused. Our President is, too.
35 posted on
03/15/2009 9:51:19 AM PDT by
Girlene
To: Nachum
if I had to pick betweenObama and Hillary, I would pick Obama. He is incompetent, lazy, and incapable of an independent thought. Hillary would be like Lenin on Steroids. Abot the only thing he has done right is send her on a series of no win situations in backwater S***holes. Watch her get stuck holding the bag on the Cuba/Venezuela mess.
Correction-I am sure the ballerina, his chief of staff, came up with the plan to neutralize her.
37 posted on
03/15/2009 9:53:18 AM PDT by
MattinNJ
(Sanford/Palin in 2012)
To: Nachum
This clown has never even run a lemonade stand, much less ever had anyone report to him.
Even the corrupt Hillary would have been better for the country!
41 posted on
03/15/2009 9:57:00 AM PDT by
aShepard
(Maybe 12/6 is the time to launch a constitutional amendment that lays out POTUS requirements!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson