Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/14/2009 8:58:38 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: neverdem

What if we gave a war and EVERYBODY came?


2 posted on 03/14/2009 9:01:50 PM PDT by coloradan (The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Never waste a good crisis, eh? Here comes gun control, in TX, of all places.
3 posted on 03/14/2009 9:06:39 PM PDT by Major Matt Mason (The Kenyan Keynesian will bankrupt this nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Tighter gun control and stronger law enforcement in Southwestern states were recommended .............

Tighter gun control? Like make more laws against gun smuggling?

4 posted on 03/14/2009 9:16:00 PM PDT by umgud (I'm really happy I wasn't aborted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

> “Let’s examine our gun laws, let’s cut down on U.S. drug consumption, let’s ask there to be more resources to root out drug-money laundering,”

Oh jeez, why don’t we add a conference on ‘world peace’ into that “equation”, shall we?


5 posted on 03/14/2009 9:16:35 PM PDT by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
let’s cut down on U.S. drug consumption

Uh... not working...

6 posted on 03/14/2009 9:23:58 PM PDT by John123 (The US may be going down the drain, but everyone else will drown first...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Tighter gun control and stronger law enforcement...

If they did the second - enforced the existing firearms laws - they wouldn't even be considering the first. In fact, they probably need more firearms in that neck-of-the-woods to help people protect themselves.

If you think the police will protect you, you are sadly mistaken. Police are there to protect society from criminals. By definition, they have to commit a crime first before the police come after them. That crime may very well be against you or your family. Your safety, and the safety of those you care about, is ultimately your own responsibility.

7 posted on 03/14/2009 9:25:44 PM PDT by CodeMasterPhilzar (I'll keep my money, my guns, and my freedom. You can keep the "change.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Brilliant. As the situation gets more dangerous, lets take away the ability of our citizens to defend themselves. With that kind of reasoning, the author is undoubtably a dem.


9 posted on 03/14/2009 9:28:37 PM PDT by Mom MD (Jesus is the Light of the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Don't you just love it? A Massachusetts's congress critter laying out the plans for "peace in our time" to the states of the southwest.
10 posted on 03/14/2009 9:29:16 PM PDT by UbonGhostrider ( Fire for effect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

bookmark


12 posted on 03/14/2009 9:41:41 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
"The United States and Mexico border violence can only be solved if we look at all parts of the equation," Rep. John Tierney, D-Mass., said Thursday during a House subcommittee considering changes to U.S. gun laws. "Let’s examine our gun laws, let’s cut down on U.S. drug consumption, let’s ask there to be more resources to root out drug-money laundering," he said.

What does some dip/stick in Mass. know about the border, butt out dummie.

15 posted on 03/14/2009 9:56:22 PM PDT by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

What a f’cking farce regarding the idea of gun control helping the situation in Mexico.

Why in the hell would the Mexican drug cartels have any use for a semiautomatic rifle bought and smuggled from the US when they can probably get all the full autos they want, CHEAPER, from elsewhere.

This is just another lame ass excuse to infringe on our rights.


19 posted on 03/14/2009 10:31:34 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Hey, what about a well constructed effective border fence? With a trillion dollars for shovel ready projects, just what are they shoveling in Congress?

20 posted on 03/14/2009 10:51:59 PM PDT by magooey (The Mandate of Heaven resides in the hearts of men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
"Tighter gun control and stronger law enforcement in Southwestern states were recommended."

The typical response by the Ayers and Angela Davis crowd.

Restrict freedoms in the US and the world will be a better place.

25 posted on 03/15/2009 12:30:57 AM PDT by NoLibZone (To save our nation a Strongly Worded e-mail may be in order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Invade Mexico and restore order. Because invading my civil rights *instead* is not an option. They are responsible for the problem, so they should suffer the consequenses, not me.


26 posted on 03/15/2009 1:03:36 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

somebody give this libtard a fork and point him to a light socket...


30 posted on 03/15/2009 5:24:54 AM PDT by Gilbo_3 ("JesusChrist 08"...Trust in the Lord......=...LiveFReeOr Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

No, we DON”T need to examine our gun laws....unless it is to REPEAL some! Dummy!


33 posted on 03/15/2009 5:40:18 AM PDT by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Rep. John Tierney, D-Mass., said Thursday during a House subcommittee considering changes to U.S. gun laws. “Let’s examine our gun laws, let’s cut down on U.S. drug consumption,


Sounds like Tierney needs to have a conversation with Ron Paul.


35 posted on 03/15/2009 5:52:50 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Scary stuff with Napolitano running the show. She couldn’t even get a handle on the violence in her own state. Phoenix is now the number 2 city for kidnappings. Could zero have picked a more incompetent person to run Homeland Security?


37 posted on 03/15/2009 6:28:50 AM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Homeland Security plans for violence on U.S. border

With Janet in Charge?
The EX-Governor of Arizona who couldn't and wouldn't control it?

38 posted on 03/15/2009 6:29:33 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
What an asshat. What does someone from Massachusetts know what's going on 1800+ miles away (and that's the closest, direct line) at the Texas / Mexican border.

And rep Tierney, in case you forgot you were elected to represent the people who live in your peehole of a district not in Texas or ANYWHERE else in the USA.

39 posted on 03/15/2009 6:34:15 AM PDT by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson