Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Between the Lines

If this is true it’s great!


2 posted on 03/13/2009 8:13:16 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lorianne

Obama’s making Jimmah the Peanut look like a friggin genius with regards to the worst precedent ever !

With such games the Obamination is trying to please all with his sh*t and shinola snake oil road show yet he is pissing off his base, his handlers, fellow polidiots and his presstitute propagandist’s as he ignores their agenda with his own seditious plan ....... I love it !

Mugabe is in the house !


147 posted on 03/14/2009 10:13:27 AM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

This is astonishing. I recall something about communications with Pope Benedict over the past week...maybe he spiritually galvanized Obama’s spine?


185 posted on 03/14/2009 10:42:48 PM PDT by Domestic Church (AMDG...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne; Coleus; Peach; airborne; Asphalt; Dr. Scarpetta; I'm ALL Right!; StAnDeliver; ovrtaxt; ...
If this is true it’s great!

Only in the sense that the Dickey-Wicker prohibitions are still in force, although its language poses problems for induced pluripotent stem cells, IMHO, withholding comment on all of this executive and legislative legerdemain.

The text of Section 509 of the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009, reads as follows:

SEC. 509. (a) None of the funds made available in this Act may be used for—(1) the creation of a human embryo or embryos for research purposes; or (2) research in which a human embryo or embryos are destroyed, discarded, or knowingly subjected to risk of injury or death greater than that allowed for research on fetuses in utero under 45 CFR 46.204(b) and section 498(b) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 289g(b)). (b) For purposes of this section, the term ‘‘human embryo or embryos’’ includes any organism, not protected as a human subject under 45 CFR 46 as of the date of the enactment of this Act, that is derived by fertilization, parthenogenesis, cloning, or any other means from one or more human gametes or human diploid cells.

198 posted on 03/15/2009 12:29:09 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson