Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gridlock

It’s floating on large Siberian rivers ... River water flows under the barge, gets sucked up into the coolers under the turbines, and goes back to the river.

No cooling tower needed. 6-10 foot diameter pipes. (2-3 meter - it’s a Russki design) but no cooling towers. They are only needed for enviro restrictions here in the US where the hot water is forbidden to go back in the river.

Simple. Easy. Cheap. Been done that way on the (up to) 500 Meg reactors for aircraft carriers for 50 years.


12 posted on 03/11/2009 4:34:09 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE

So, why does the US restrict discharge temperature? I realize the design is much simpler if you can just dump 120 degree F water back into the river. From an engineering point of view, it is no-brainer. But are there actual environmental impacts that are worth avoiding?

Of course, you are rejecting heat to either the river or the atmosphere, so which has the greater impact?


15 posted on 03/11/2009 5:03:25 AM PDT by gridlock (BTW, Mods... It might be time to add "Barack" and "Obama" to spellcheck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE; pobeda1945
And on Thursday, Energy Secretary Steven Chu told a Senate hearing that the Yucca Mountain site no longer was viewed as an option for storing reactor waste
16 posted on 03/11/2009 5:43:34 AM PDT by Pontiac (Your message here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson