Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

So, why does the US restrict discharge temperature? I realize the design is much simpler if you can just dump 120 degree F water back into the river. From an engineering point of view, it is no-brainer. But are there actual environmental impacts that are worth avoiding?

Of course, you are rejecting heat to either the river or the atmosphere, so which has the greater impact?


15 posted on 03/11/2009 5:03:25 AM PDT by gridlock (BTW, Mods... It might be time to add "Barack" and "Obama" to spellcheck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: gridlock
So, why does the US restrict discharge temperature? I realize the design is much simpler if you can just dump 120 degree F water back into the river. From an engineering point of view, it is no-brainer. But are there actual environmental impacts that are worth avoiding?

In my experience living on Lake Erie near several power plants with hot water discharge pipes in to the lake, some of the best fishing is on or near those hot water discharges.

17 posted on 03/11/2009 5:46:56 AM PDT by Pontiac (Your message here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: gridlock

See answer above (Nbr 20)


21 posted on 03/11/2009 6:23:11 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson