Skip to comments.
Scalia: You need 4 votes for Obama eligibility case
WND ^
| 3-10-09
| Bob Unruh
Posted on 03/10/2009 6:35:13 PM PDT by hope
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-133 next last
To: blaquebyrd
Man up and say it.
But I've already told you I can't. I don't want to lose my posting privileges.
Just use your imagination. You seem adept at that.
101
posted on
03/11/2009 10:33:49 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
"I don't want to lose my posting privileges. Just use your imagination. You seem adept at that." Your cyber toughness has me cyber terrified. Seriously, I've enjoyed the debate. That's what I love about this site. Grown folks can engage in civil debate without resorting to the childish cyber bullying tactics embraced at DU. Have a blessed day my FRiend.
To: blaquebyrd
Grown folks can engage in civil debate...Too bad you didn't act like a grown up, what with you trying to insinuate things that were not so and like offering up stupid questions like the ones about the FBI files that were stolen before 44 was even elected to public office in Illinois.
Have a blessed day my FRiend.
Yeah, you have a nice day too.
103
posted on
03/11/2009 10:46:35 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: blaquebyrd
...offering up stupid questions like the ones about the FBI files that were stolen before 44 was even elected to public office in Illinois.
Would that be cyber intelligence?
104
posted on
03/11/2009 10:51:01 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: philman_36
"Too bad you didn't act like a grown up, what with you trying to insinuate things that were not so and like offering up stupid questions like the ones about the FBI files that were stolen before 44 was even elected to public office in Illinois." Yeah and you did with your cyber threats. I swear I've met more tough guys on-line than I have in 20 plus years of military service. All you guys are a joke with your, "I'd really tell you something if it weren't for the mods", tough talk. Defend your position and save the tough talk for My Space.
To: blaquebyrd
Yeah and you did with your cyber threats.
And what "threats" were those?
106
posted on
03/11/2009 11:01:02 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: blaquebyrd
Defend your position...I thought I had. You
did say...
You winI give up.That
usually means that the other person defended their position.
107
posted on
03/11/2009 11:03:41 AM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: WheresMyBailout
108
posted on
03/11/2009 11:03:46 AM PDT
by
Osage Orange
(Our constitution protects aliens, drunks and U.S. Senators. -Will Rogers)
To: appeal2
Well...............I doubt that that will happen.
Not that I wouldn't want him out....but the MSM / DBM will not give up that easily....IMO
109
posted on
03/11/2009 11:06:36 AM PDT
by
Osage Orange
(Our constitution protects aliens, drunks and U.S. Senators. -Will Rogers)
To: zeugma
Its a huge post, that will normally get bumped to several hundred postsI think....you meant hugh and series post.
But I could be wong........
110
posted on
03/11/2009 11:09:21 AM PDT
by
Osage Orange
(Our constitution protects aliens, drunks and U.S. Senators. -Will Rogers)
To: hope
fix is in...corruption is widespread regardless of party...
111
posted on
03/11/2009 11:10:12 AM PDT
by
surfer
To: WheresMyBailout
He never said there were three justices, or even one justice, in support of this petition. Scalia is quoted in the article as saying: "Bring the case, I'll hear it, I don't know about others."
To: blaquebyrd
"To believe her story is to believe Scalia to be an incompetent justice who decides which cases to hear from customers at a book signing. Absolutely agree 100%. SC Justices are so painfully carefull about not commenting on cases that are before the court, or that have even the most remote possibility of comming before the court. There is NO WAY that a man as sharp as Scalia said this. It is an absolute fabrication.
To: Osage Orange
I think....you meant hugh and series post.But I could be wong........
Yes, that's exactly what I meant to say, but I was distracted by my Viking Kitty attacking a moose.
114
posted on
03/11/2009 3:02:44 PM PDT
by
zeugma
(Will it be nukes or aliens? Time will tell.)
To: WheresMyBailout
Is this the first website you’ve posted at? I doubt it. You are a n00b and get used to being “hazed” on any political forum you join.
AM
To: WheresMyBailout
you’re pretty quick and I love yer homepage...so many cowards don’t have one
but....MHGinTN is a good guy
not sure if your a real newbie or a returnee
but Good luck
just friendly advice
116
posted on
03/11/2009 3:38:52 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
(The world has gone to shite since I was a lad in the idyllic 60s)
To: WheresMyBailout
Well,you know what they say...if you can’t stand the heat..........
117
posted on
03/11/2009 3:52:31 PM PDT
by
razbinn
(I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America,and to the republic for which it ...)
To: blaquebyrd
I can't imagine a US Supreme Court Justice dispensing legal advice advice to a potential plaintiff at his book signing. That was my initial reaction. But then Taitz (as quoted by WND), gives such a detailed description of what transpired. On reflection I think you are probably right. Which can only mean that Taitz is a pathological liar. I don't know enough about her to know if there is any other evidence for this.
Of course if there were really 300 other people at this event, surely someone else would report what happened.
To: hope
The list of cases that the SCOTUS has denied related to the eligibility of Obama to be president is both discouraging and enlightening. It strongly suggests that there is a lot of political influence pressuring the Court to deny the case. This is problematic because the Court is supposed to be an apolitical body that rules solely on the basis of the Constitution and case law.
For the SCOTUS to deny a case (as it has in many cases involving Obama’s eligibility) on the grounds that the plaintiff has no standing to bring suit is troubling. Establishing Obama’s eligibility to be POTUS is a fundamental function of the Court and ANY American citizen should have standing to bring the case before the SCOTUS.
If Obama is eventually proven to not be eligible to be president, IMO, the backlash will be severe. The DNC will have been proven to have acted against the best interests of and the laws of the United States. In addition, by not pursuing this issue to resolution, the Congress will be held complicit in refusing to address the issue and the Democrat party will have placed itself and its future as a major political party into the mud.
This is not going to go away anytime soon.
119
posted on
03/11/2009 5:46:25 PM PDT
by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: blaquebyrd
Or... and I know that this sounds tin-hat ... There’s something else afoot. On Barbara Simpson’s radio show last week (560 KSFO in San Francisco) she said that when the issue is brought up on the air, “threats are made”. And that’s why no one with a national audience (except Savage -— but he’s out there anyway) will bring it up.
120
posted on
03/11/2009 6:04:59 PM PDT
by
JoeA
(JoeA / welcome to third world politics.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-133 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson