[DevNet]

Thank you - we are all guilty of that at one point or another.

If more people - ON BOTH SIDES - would be civil to each other the debates would be more productive.

But I will have to say that you have been kind to me - which is a marked difference than the way most on your side have treated me. For that I am appreciative.

[do the dhue]

I think it is the passion for one’s belief that inspires the unrest on both sides.

I really don't agree with the headline of this article because my belief in God was created in my heart and not my mind. For others, I can not speak. For me, I know what I felt the day I was saved and I know what I feel now. I suppose people who have never felt this will never understand it. That is OK with me, because of the free will thing. I love freedom and when I see different beliefs. I see the freedom that God has given us.

Therefore, I don't care to change anyone’s mind about evolution, God, and so on. I would only like to remind people that believing in God given rights is better then believing in man or guvmint given Rights.

[do the dhue]

I have a question for you. I am not trying to spark a debate, just an understanding. How do evolutionist account for ice ages. I mean, if we evolve according to our environment, wouldn't the mastodon shed it's fur and adapt to it's new environment when the planet warmed? Wouldn’t we see more evidence of animals evolving from cold weather animal to warm weather animals? And there have been several ice ages. Therefore, wouldn't there be some evidence of animals growing ‘cold weather gear’ and shedding cold weather gear?

Glaciers formed all the way down to New York City and beyond. The ice was four times as high as the Empire State building. It would take a long time to melt all that ice and therefore give animals time to evolve around it. Is there any evidence to support this from an evolutionist point of view?

Again, I am not trying to spark a passionate debate, just an understanding.