Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What If Iran Gets A Working Nuclear Weapon?
IranPressNews ^ | March 9, 2009 | By Barry Rubin

Posted on 03/10/2009 10:14:21 AM PDT by Fennie

If and when Iran gets nuclear weapons it would set off a global nightmare.

Most obviously, Iran could use nuclear arms to attack Israel. It's easy to say that Iran's leaders would be cautious, but what if ideology, error, or an extremist faction decides to wipe the Jewish state off the map? Even a 10-percent chance of nuclear holocaust is terrifying.

And if Israel decides its existence is at risk, it would launch a preemptive attack that would also produce a big crisis.

Once Iran has nuclear weapons, every Arab state, with the exception of Iran's ally Syria, would also be imperiled. Those countries would beg for U.S. protection. But could they depend on America, under the Barack Obama administration, to go to war - especially a nuclear one - to shield them?

(Excerpt) Read more at iranpressnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhoiran; bhomiddleeast; iran; iraniannukes; iraq; islam; israel; jihad; nuclear; obama; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: Fennie
What If Iran Gets A Working Nuclear Weapon?

What if What happens when Iran Gets A Working Nuclear Weapon?

41 posted on 03/10/2009 11:29:04 AM PDT by Iron Munro (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

I think Sting was correct as a matter a fact, mutually insured destruction was not a game the russians wanted to play, cause like us, in the end, the wanted to live, had families, and were much more “like us” than “unlike us”. The Russians most definitely loved the children.

The “others” will shall call them, will gladly do an honor killing of thier children for various things, and to die killing others is a ticket to Allah, there is a difference, I just meant that the song he sang in many respects had a lot of truth in it.


42 posted on 03/10/2009 12:03:52 PM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Wyatt's Torch

They won’t hit us first. The fact of this serious matter is Iran will indeed gain a couple of relatively crude nuclear devices within the next three to ten years, but they will be on par with the 1945 nukes we used, not our ‘dial a nuke’ technology.

They won’t have several THOUSAND on hand, as we do today, in short.

They’ll hit Israel. My guess is via a nuclear bomb carrying ship, or even a fishing boat, at Haifa. They won’t risk losing it trying to get it into Tel Aviv via truck, and they don’t have the delivery system to send it via a parabolic arc.

To me the more pertinent question is will we, the United States, grant asylum to the survivors of Israel being hit with a nuclear weapon. The country is so small, a nuclear explosion - and believe the Iranians will in fact make it as ‘dirty’ a nuke as possible...well, it would end Israel’s existence as a nation in my opinion, due to the fall out alone.

Obama might send a strongly worded letter in response, but thats about it.


43 posted on 03/10/2009 12:15:23 PM PDT by Badeye (There are no 'great moments' in Moderate Political History. Only losses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

Iran could also fire one of their missles from a ship, aimed at the US. No one could respond quick enough to defend against it. You don’t need a launching pad for this.


44 posted on 03/10/2009 12:17:37 PM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC2
That's the exact scenario that plays out in Joel Rosenberg's Dead Heat. SCUD missiles are launched of the coast from container transport ships and give cities 3-5 minutes warning.
45 posted on 03/10/2009 12:37:14 PM PDT by Wyatt's Torch (I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard

Bingo


46 posted on 03/10/2009 2:01:48 PM PDT by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Scythian
I have that Sting song and like playing the Scorpion's "Wind of Change" right after it as a reminder of what an idiot Sting was.
47 posted on 03/10/2009 2:08:55 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
You are assuming that Obama has the will and guts to nuke Iran if they hit the United States. I don't. Where I once had some hope that he'd be a moderate along the lines of Bill Clinton, he's quickly shown himself to be more naive, stupid, and wrong than Jimmy Carter, the guy who let the radicals take over Iran, the Sandinistas take over Nicaragua, the PLO take over Lebanon, and so on without doing anything to stop it. While it would be difficult to imagine a real man sitting back and letting his country taking a nuclear hit, I think anyone foolish enough to think he can negotiate with "moderate Taliban" and who is stupid enough to kick the economy while it's down just might. And let's hope the Iranians and others don't start seeing it that way.
48 posted on 03/10/2009 2:13:20 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

Sting wasn’t correct because he doubted the Russians loved
their children and didn’t trust Ronald Reagan to keep him
safe. The score as shown by history? Ronald Reagan: 1, Sting: 0


49 posted on 03/10/2009 2:15:19 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you'd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

----------------------------

Simple, they will become the dominant power in the middle east. Not to worry, our cars will be running on wind. They can't take that away, can they? No matter, my car will run on potato salad.


50 posted on 03/10/2009 3:12:51 PM PDT by SJackson (a tax cut is non-targetedÂ…no guaranteeÂ…theyÂ’re free to invest anywhere that they want, J Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions

Obama and what he wants or thinks is literally out of the equation if America is openly struck by nuclear fire.

not responding immediately would probably end his life by coup in about 14 seconds.
Just my take on power in such matters. But I share your assessment of Hussein.


51 posted on 03/10/2009 6:09:20 PM PDT by bill1952 (Power is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: bill1952; Question_Assumptions

Not meant to disagree with your post. - Perhaps my take is angry wishful thinking.

I know that I would personally remove him in such a case if I had any power at all to attempt such a thing, with all legalities aside.


52 posted on 03/10/2009 6:38:22 PM PDT by bill1952 (Power is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
Obama and what he wants or thinks is literally out of the equation if America is openly struck by nuclear fire.

While a coup is possible, as are rogue military using their weapons without authorization (from what I've heard, the "football" isn't necessary to use some of them), that doesn't mean he won't be stupid enough to try a round of Kumbaya, first. I believe that he'd try to argue that the use of atomic weapons against any enemy is a war crime that he can't engage in. In fact, the way he's been going, I'm starting to believe he's the sort of leftist who would sacrifice his country for that sort of nonsense. And like I said, I hope his enemies don't start believing it or this could be a real short ride to worst president in American history.

53 posted on 03/10/2009 6:38:35 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions
I can't disagree with the direction of your argument.

After all, his name is Hussein.

54 posted on 03/10/2009 6:43:28 PM PDT by bill1952 (Power is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

Let’s hope that we never have to find out what happen if the United States is hit with nuclear weapons, whether Obama is president or not. As much as I can’t stand him and think he’s a menace to the country, I don’t wish him dead.


55 posted on 03/10/2009 7:34:42 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

I think that his liberalism matters more than his name. I think he’d react the same way to the North Koreans.


56 posted on 03/10/2009 7:35:29 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson