Well, you can read it all for yourself, but the jist of it is that the earlier Berg case found that the plaintiff had no legal standing to initiate the suit and the case was dismissed.
Was it a preliminary remedy or a final one?
I think Berg appealed but I don't believe the case has been heard yet. However, in his ruling last week the judge did refer to the October decision from the Berg v. Obama case as reason for dismissal.
Why don’t you enlighten us out of your vast knowledge of the legal system?
How's that so far?
Not very good. Standing, as anyone familiar with the system knows, is separate from the merits of the case. Further, it is a doctrine that varies greatly from court to court and is continually being litigated and re-investigated all the way up to the Supreme Court.
Also, you seem to be confusing petitions and requests for preliminary relief at various levels as well as having little knowledge of what the actual standing of the several Berg litigations is at present. Why don’t you do a little research for yourself, and more importantly, make accurate representations.