Not very good. Standing, as anyone familiar with the system knows, is separate from the merits of the case. Further, it is a doctrine that varies greatly from court to court and is continually being litigated and re-investigated all the way up to the Supreme Court.
Also, you seem to be confusing petitions and requests for preliminary relief at various levels as well as having little knowledge of what the actual standing of the several Berg litigations is at present. Why don’t you do a little research for yourself, and more importantly, make accurate representations.
If you don't have standing then how can the case have any merit?
Further, it is a doctrine that varies greatly from court to court and is continually being litigated and re-investigated all the way up to the Supreme Court.
It seems to be pretty consistently applied in these cases.
Also, you seem to be confusing petitions and requests for preliminary relief at various levels as well as having little knowledge of what the actual standing of the several Berg litigations is at present. Why don’t you do a little research for yourself, and more importantly, make accurate representations.
All I know is what I read in the judges decisions. And to date those haven't been complimentary towards Berg or his schemes.