Once again you display your ignorance. What is it that was actually decided in the earlier Berg decision of which you speak and procedurally where was it, and what remedy was actually involved? Was it a preliminary remedy or a final one?
Why don’t you enlighten us out of your vast knowledge of the legal system?
Well, you can read it all for yourself, but the jist of it is that the earlier Berg case found that the plaintiff had no legal standing to initiate the suit and the case was dismissed.
Was it a preliminary remedy or a final one?
I think Berg appealed but I don't believe the case has been heard yet. However, in his ruling last week the judge did refer to the October decision from the Berg v. Obama case as reason for dismissal.
Why don’t you enlighten us out of your vast knowledge of the legal system?
How's that so far?