Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Rush SHOULD have said
RedState.com ^ | 6 March 2009 | Jack Savage

Posted on 03/09/2009 8:54:41 AM PDT by BufordP

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: anglian
Democrats "support" our troops like Rush "supports" Obama.

This is pretty much a CIVIL WAR....we have lost MOST of our money.....what is next???

21 posted on 03/09/2009 10:34:46 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
We need to get away from talking of things being "Orwellian".

We also need to get away from talking about things Limbaughian 24-7.

Why are conservatives still gullibly engaging in this cynically contrived controversy about Rush Limbaugh?

This is playing right into the hands of the Democrats who deliberately stirred up this phony hornet's nest to deflect from their Maximum Leader's gross ineptitude managing the economy & sabotaging the financial markets.

Extending this bogus discussion ad nauseum is exactly what this WH wants us to do: let's talk about a syndicated radio talk show host instead of the fact that Barack Obama is deliberately torpedoing the foundations of capitalism right under our noses.

And, like clockwork, there's always an army of naive conservatives who take the bait & fall right into their trap. Repeatedly.

Unbelievable.

If they can change the subject, we are free to change it right back again. We don't have to keep letting democrats setting the agenda of the national debate, and we sure as hell are not obligated to contnue to AID & ABET them to do just that!

Honestly, sometimes we conservatives have all the political street smarts of rubes on a turnip truck.

22 posted on 03/09/2009 10:54:23 AM PDT by leilani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
I was listening...perhaps you'd like to re-read what you wrote:

"We need to get away from talking of things being "Orwellian". George Orwell was writing about Stalinists in the West...When things are "Orwellian", they are Stalinist...Don't couch it under "fictionalized" realities."

My point is, while the modern left certainly employs the tactics and techniques of Stalin, the technology they have to do so is above and beyond that of anything Stalin had, and that contemporary reality more closely mirrors (or soon will) Orwell's fiction than it does Stalin's USSR....ergo the term "Orwellian" is perfectly apt in reference to the designs of the modern left.

23 posted on 03/09/2009 11:35:31 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BufordP
“I support Obama but I do not support his mission.”

???????

I.D.I.O.T. !

24 posted on 03/09/2009 3:54:36 PM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

I swear, so many many freepers are just too g-d serious.


25 posted on 03/09/2009 6:04:17 PM PDT by BufordP ("I've abandoned free market principles to save the free market system."--George "the Abandoner" Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson