If passed in Illinois, every state will follow suit.
1 posted on
03/07/2009 10:50:51 AM PST by
Bullpine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: Bullpine
It will NOT pass in Arkansas.
2 posted on
03/07/2009 10:53:30 AM PST by
spectre
To: Bullpine
Fine, media outlets need to carry Libel & Slander insurance.
To: Bullpine
If passed in Illinois, every state will follow suit.Not a chance in hell it passes here in Texas.
4 posted on
03/07/2009 10:54:18 AM PST by
Shady Ray
To: Bullpine
This is total Bulls**t
In every state, the Plaintiff Lawyer Lobby (Those who sue you for damages) will instantly file a suit against anyone who shoots another—regardless of how justified that shooting is.
We who are prudent already have this coverage
5 posted on
03/07/2009 10:56:04 AM PST by
radar101
To: Bullpine
That's the idea, isn't it.
It's all about money and power. It always has been, it always will be.
As long as America is armed, certain people feel uncomfortable because they can't do whatever they want with impunity. It's all about power, and anyone proposing such laws is either an ignorant tool or a socialist bastard.
6 posted on
03/07/2009 10:56:17 AM PST by
Red6
To: Bullpine
If the gun grabbers can’t ban guns, they’ll try to tax and regulate them out of existence.
To: Bullpine
$1,000,000 specifically covering any damages resulting from negligent or willful acts involving the use of such firearm while it is owned by such person.I can't envision any insurance company paying for willfull or negligent acts with a firearm. It's hard enough getting coverage for stolen guns.
8 posted on
03/07/2009 10:58:35 AM PST by
umgud
(I'm really happy I wasn't aborted)
To: Bullpine
Some l;ittle gun hating sissy must sit in a closet all day playing with himself and coming up with these half azzed ideas.
Whoever came up with this needs to be dragged out by the scrotum and get the crap kicked out of them.
9 posted on
03/07/2009 10:59:26 AM PST by
Venturer
To: Bullpine
How about a $1,000,000 insurance policy for every act of legislative madness? Now
there's something we could all use.
2010: Send the bastards home
|
10 posted on
03/07/2009 10:59:43 AM PST by
NonValueAdded
(May God save America from its government; this is no time for Obamateurs. Emmanuel = Haldeman?)
To: Bullpine
What a load of crap.
Surprise Massachusetts didn’t think of this first.
Be cheaper to mandate wearing of t-shirts saying, ‘I’m unarmed. Feel free to rob or rape me.’
11 posted on
03/07/2009 11:01:00 AM PST by
OpeEdMunkey
(We seem to have reached a critical mass of stupid people.)
To: Bullpine
Ah yes.......let’s only allow rich people to have guns.....sort of like we used to do in the old south, ya know...Jim Crow and all that.
To: Bullpine
If they can’t demand ID for exercising voting rights, because the very poor could be disenfranchised, then how can they demand ANY fee for exercising a persons second ammendment rights, especially something expensive like this?
13 posted on
03/07/2009 11:03:43 AM PST by
Travis T. OJustice
(Change is not a destination, just as hope is not a strategy. FUBO!)
To: Bullpine
Not a chance in hell it’s even considered in Illinois. Geez.
To: Bullpine
Besides the issues of cost and availability, the gun insurance requirement is also a means of tracking gun ownership. It will require gun owners to either willfully violate the insurance law, subjecting themselves to criminal penalties (what are the chances that an overzealous police chief decides that there will be insurance card checks, and making impromptu visits to shooting ranges or hunting venues), or self-report ownership, which is one more incremental step towards first state, and then national registration.
16 posted on
03/07/2009 11:11:17 AM PST by
KAUAIBOUND
(Hawaii - paradise infested with left-wing cockroaches and centipedes)
To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allerious; ...
Provides that any person who owns a firearm in this State shall maintain a policy of liability insurance in the amount of at least $1,000,000 ...
Libertarian ping! Click
here to get added or
here to be removed or post a message here!
24 posted on
03/07/2009 11:51:50 AM PST by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: Bullpine
Can we then bring back the poll tax? Only those who can afford it, will be able to vote.
You know, one constitutional right for another, what's the diff?
25 posted on
03/07/2009 12:06:51 PM PST by
jeffc
(They're coming to take me away! Ha-ha, hey-hey, ho-ho!)
To: Bullpine
Take a look at the bill's sponsor.
Representative Kenneth Dunkin (D)5th District
5th district map
This is a Chicago District. I bet Dunkin's constituents who want them have guns and I bet they are and will continue to be unregistered and uninsured. This is just like US Rep. Bobby Rush(Also from Chicago) and his HR45 gun grab.
To: Bullpine
I won’t post what time I think it is, if that passes Constitutional muster.
31 posted on
03/07/2009 1:05:44 PM PST by
FreedomPoster
(Obama: Carter's only chance to avoid going down in history as the worst U.S. president ever.)
To: Bullpine
If passed in Illinois, every state will follow suit.
NOT IN TEXAS...
33 posted on
03/07/2009 1:13:17 PM PST by
JohnD9207
(Lead...follow...or get the HELL out of the way!)
To: Bullpine
It also won’t work in Indiana.
34 posted on
03/07/2009 1:14:16 PM PST by
Rappini
("Pro deo et Patria.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson