To: EternalVigilance
Sarah Palin is a politician, first and foremost. I have warned people that in four years she will be irrelevant. She is conservative only in comparison to McCain, but she is still a republican cut from the same cloth. A Reagan she is not and I doubt she is a reaganite. We need to get pack to our roots, she is a populist and we don't need any more of them. We have one in the white house right now.
368 posted on
03/06/2009 4:47:48 PM PST by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
To: Cacique
You’re right. The RNC is now firmly in the control of Mitt Romney and his minions anyway.
370 posted on
03/06/2009 4:54:37 PM PST by
EternalVigilance
("Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair..." - G. Washington)
To: Cacique
I doubt she is a reaganite.She is most certainly *not* a Reaganite.
She is, much as you say, a moderate populist, with libertarian leanings, much in the same cut as Fred Thompson.
371 posted on
03/06/2009 5:07:04 PM PST by
roamer_1
(Proud 1%er... Reagan Conservatism is the only way forward.)
To: Cacique; mnehrling; calex59; Gene Eric; Lucius Cornelius Sulla; SoConPubbie; kevkrom
Sarah Palin is a politician, first and foremost. So...what are the odds of you actually reading the rest of the thread after finishing the article?
You might be surprised at what you find out.
383 posted on
03/06/2009 6:55:36 PM PST by
Ultra Sonic 007
(To view the FR@Alabama ping list, click on my profile!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson