Posted on 03/06/2009 9:15:49 AM PST by EternalVigilance
YIKES!!!
I don’t trust anything from this source actually on the topic of Sarah Palin.
Try this one:
http://www.adn.com/news/government/story/711378.html
The substance of this piece is accurate.
I hope it ain’t true....I DONT WANT any of our elected officials reaching across to a liberal.
Here we go again, as always, there is more to the piss poor reporting by the media than appears. See the threads here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2200375/posts
and here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2199866/posts
Surprised how many people see something in the MSM and take it at face value without the slightest thought it may be BS.
Welcome to the world of politics, where choosing from the lesser of two evils is part of the job description.
Also, it is always important to look under the story and it’s reporter. Often times you’ll uncover a few worms.
Ping, let’s see how many people ‘trust’ the MSM on this or have the intellectual curiosity to dig a little deeper.
Marvelous.
I’m with you. Trust who!?! The Press? The same paper that’s tried to destroy Sarah since the start?
Come now...
It’s also worth noting that people CAN change (they usually don’t, but they can).
IF this turns out to be true, then it is certainly a dumb movement on Sarah’s part — but I think I’ll see how it all shakes out when I hear from more reliable and principled sources.
Maybe we should trust the ‘pro-life Christian’ group that leveled this charge who is promoting the more liberal, pro-abortion Smith instead of Christen. Ask yourself that question and a whole new world of thoughts open as to the motivation behind this.
They take it at face value because they’re just looking for dirt to quote and say, “I told you so!”, in trying to “substantiate” their assumptions.
As a rule, I immediately suspect stories that come from the MSM.
“Under the state Constitution, Palin HAD TO select from among the nominees sent to her by the seven-member Alaska Judicial Council, made up of lawyers, public members appointed by governors and the Supreme Court chief justice, currently Dana Fabe.”
I’ll bet everyone here a donut that Mrs. Palin picked ‘The Lesser of Two Evils’ from the stack of leftist appointees that landed on her desk...
Thanks for these links.
I’ll read them and will probably realize that Palin remains pro-life.
But.... in 3 years - as she makes another move toward the WH - this will be used against her by libs who like to slant the news:
PALIN SUPPORTED PRO-CHOICE PLANNED PARENTHOOD JUSTICE
The word is “former”. If it weren’t for the “former” Nazi rocket scientist that came to work here after the war we would never have gotten to the moon as fast as we did.
ping
Right. This is an opinion piece from the Palin hating Fagan. It is filled with half-truths and spin designed to get conservatives angry with Palin. Let’s see how many take the bait.
Amazing how so many people on this site latch onto every negative word written or spoken against Republicans.
You must enjoy being led around by the nose.
They are all RINOs ~ they just don’t know it yet, but they will when we EXPEL them from the party and burn their membership cards in front of them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.