Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s Rush Quickens
Red State ^ | Friday, March 6th | Warner Todd Huston

Posted on 03/06/2009 7:10:50 AM PST by Delacon

It’s been two days now since Rush Limbaugh first challenged President Obama to a duel of words, a debate on issues, and five since the president and his surrogates made Rush the main Democratic Party talking point. Of course, the White House is pretending to stand above such a request from a mere talk radio mouth — no response on the challenge has yet emerged. Yet, Obama’s Press Secretary, his Chief of Staff, and all the Old Media folks that his Chief of Staff instructs on a daily basis in that well known morning strategy session all have been using Rush Limbaugh as a main talking point since the Sunday morning following Rush’s CPAC speech.

Not only has Obama’s seconds come out swinging at Rush, but the whole of the lefty blogosphere has joined in on the taking points. Never the sort to do much self-generated thinking, the lefty gab-o-sphere has with relish taken up the banner and run with it. Naturally, the tenor of discussion has fallen off a cliff into the typical guttural guffaws and epithets at which the left excels. From a purported “Assistant Professor in the Practice of International Politics at Columbia University” on Huffington Post to the DailyKossacks, the name calling is piling up.

With his attack on Rush Limbaugh, however, Obama risks a backlash that just might hit him where it hurts: his own credibility.

The “Assistant Professor” I mention above developed the theme that Rush is a “clown” that is beneath the attention of the President of the United States. He went on to claim that should Obama deign to debate Limbaugh the president would help Limbaugh “gain in status” simply by engaging the radio talker. To a certain degree Limbaugh himself agrees with the basic concept of his uplift by Obama.

Before I go on, I find this theme quite amusing. Why? Well, because it’s the same theme that conservatives have employed to explain why a U.S. president shouldn’t engage in “diplomacy” with terrorists and thugs like Ahmadinejad and Osamma bin Laden! It was a claim the left called stupid. Now, all of a sudden, the same argument is the chief argument to use. Only one word describes this situation; hypocrisy.

So, as you may have guessed, I ascribe to this theory. If I were president and an unhinged lefty radio twerp were challenging me to a debate, I would ignore the situation entirely.

However, I would also be insisting that my surrogates do the same. And this is why Obama could easily come out on the losing end of this game he’s playing with Rush Limbaugh. Obama and his administration should have given the Limbaugh theme scant notice. If anything, a brief statement and then silence should have been the tact.

Why could this bite (or byte, as the case may be) Obama? Because he allowed — and probably helped plan — this all out attack on a mere talk radio guy by his White House staff and all the Old Media folks they control. Folks like George Stephenapolous, Paul Begala and James Carville have filled the airwaves with the talking points they’ve been handed. On top of that even Obama’s Chief of Staff and his Press Secretary have engaged the radio talker in verbal attacks.

So, Limbaugh, being the brilliant promoter that he is, issued his debate challenge. And then… and then what? Obama ignores it? After a week of his closest advisors, employees, and all their pals attacking Limbaugh, NOW President Obama pretends that Limbaugh is meaningless?

How does it look to the general, disengaged public when everyone that surrounds a president engages in the same quest to demean a single talk show host, yet than that president pretends the subject isn’t worthy of his time? Doesn’t this confuse the people? After all, if Rush isn’t really worth the president’s time, why is his whole staff getting so exercised over him? Someone in the White House must think Rush is important!

Now add that quixotic reaction to February’s statement by the president that Republicans “just can’t listen to Rush” and carry forward with the people’s business.

It all adds up to Obama’s hypocrisy on the matter. It also adds up to a certain element of fear evinced by Obama. People cannot help but imagine that the president and his staff are afraid of Rush. Both because they are talking about him all the time, but pretending he isn’t important, AND because the president refuses to debate him even after bringing him into the debate.

As I said, this could easily reflect badly on the president all the way around. His opponents will taunt him that he is afraid of a mere radio talker and his supporters will be angry that he gave that same radio guy the time of day.

President Obama is quickly rushing himself into a no win scenario. It is fast coming to a point where Rush Limbaugh wins no matter what. And that right there is funny no matter who you are.



TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barackobama; bho; bho2009; bho44; obama; rush; rushlimbaugh; talkradio; waronrush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: Canadian Outrage

Thank you very much for wanting us to suceed in this endeavor of getting back our country.


41 posted on 03/06/2009 8:09:53 AM PST by Piquaboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Piquaboy

I love the United States. I’ve followed your politics very closely for nearly 30 years. I also have two American cousins and they are both just sick at what’s going on. I KNOW what Socialism is like. We had a lot of years of pure red Lieberals. We have only had a good solid Conservative in for the last 3 years. But it takes time to undo liberal destruction. And in fact, I have NEVER seen destruction so fast as I’m seeing happening in your country right now. Not even here. The last group of Liberals took 13 years to do their dirty work. I wouldn’t give Oboma 13 months. He will be much speedier than that I’m afraid. And your welcome. Regards, CO


42 posted on 03/06/2009 8:26:10 AM PST by Canadian Outrage (Conservatism is to a country what an antibiotic is to an infection - Healing!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage; PhilDragoo
Have you ever tried to listen to Obottom try to speak without a teleprompter? It’s literal torture. He can string an entire sentence together. He stutters and stammers and repeats part phrases and words because he CANA’T THINK of what to say. He makes former President Bush sound like a linguistic genius.

Boz0 Zer0 needs a teleprompter to help him say "UH"

43 posted on 03/06/2009 8:34:51 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Zer0's friends are criminals, foreign/domestic terrorists, perverts, sexual deviates or tax cheats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

LOL. TRUE Grampa D. CO


44 posted on 03/06/2009 8:42:43 AM PST by Canadian Outrage (Conservatism is to a country what an antibiotic is to an infection - Healing!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: gracesdad
Any president debating an unelected entertainer — and yes Rush is a political entertainer — is a bad idea.

Over 20 million listeners have elected Rush their trusted political voice. While his personality and approach are certainly engaging, the pure substance of his broadcasts is sobering. There is nothing entertaining about the boldness and courage required to expose Obama and the infiltrating Left's attempt to cast America into the toilet.

Why in the world do you feel a debate would be a bad idea?

45 posted on 03/06/2009 9:56:55 AM PST by taraytarah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

the final line is already here.


46 posted on 03/06/2009 2:56:03 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I only meant it figuratively and fancifully, the recall.
But of course there was a Gray Davis recall in CA, so now I wonder why the same option can’t be applied to a President. Having said that, I am sure I’m not the only one thinking about grounds for impeachment. First out of the box, just get the collective “birther” devotees push their case, and it will have to be much harder than it’s been done so far (the MSM sits astride this story like a mountain-sized mother hen). It would be a wonderful thing to see Obambi unmasked.


47 posted on 03/06/2009 3:59:01 PM PST by supremedoctrine ("One was drawing funny faces, but his own was grave"--Richard Hughes, A High Wind in Jamaica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: edzo4

I like that “FBO”
Free Barack Obama, from a position he has no business
holding. (pause) riiiiiiigggghhht????


48 posted on 03/06/2009 4:00:58 PM PST by supremedoctrine ("One was drawing funny faces, but his own was grave"--Richard Hughes, A High Wind in Jamaica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy
Photobucket
49 posted on 03/06/2009 9:19:02 PM PST by Tex Pete (Obama for Change: from our pockets, our piggy banks, and our couch cushions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tex Pete

Bozo Zero The Clown. Well done.


50 posted on 03/07/2009 6:23:40 AM PST by RetiredArmy (Destruction of the US Economy: Obama's Global War on Prosperity!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson