THe less amazing “irony” is that he did NOT have British (or any other but American) citizenship at birth, as he was NOT in the custody of his absent father ; but in the custody of his MOTHER : a bona fide US Citizen.
The court was rather frank on this matter, but probably more restrained than it could have been.
There is not-and never was credible evidence Obama was anything other than a native-born US Citizen; however, it would appear this lack of evidence is now to be used as “proof of a conspiracy”.
It is one thing to lament over the loss of an election; and quite another to lose one’s common sense.
Wrong. So very wrong. Barry even admits to both facts on his own campaign web site.
Quote: ". As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.
Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”"
Barry himself was a British Subject from the time of his birth (hospital, house, clinic of birth unknown) until Aug 4 1982.
But under the laws at the time, his mother, as a minor (17) was not able to confer citizenship to her son if he was not DEMONSTRABLY born in the United States.
The "defendant" is in control of the evidence and refuses to produce it.
The fact remains Sen McCain showed his original BC, Obama did NOT.