At it again: Anti-gunners trying to demonize yet another class of firearms

Seattle Gun Rights Examiner ^ | 4 March, 2009 | Dave Workman

[marktwain]

First it was “plastic guns” that critics, including perennial anti-gun Senator Edward M. Kennedy, hysterically claimed could become the weapon of choice of terrorist because they did not show up on x-ray machines. But the “plastic gun” turned out to be a myth, and the pistol once called a “terrorist weapon” for its use of polymer components around a steel frame – the Glock – is now the choice of American police officers. Then it was the “semiautomatic assault-weapon,” pilloried in the press because it looked like a military firearm and had some cosmetic features some people didn’t like, and this allowed the fear-peddlers at the Violence Policy Center (VPC) an opportunity to confuse people and gull them into supporting a ten-year ban that accomplished nothing, especially when it came to protecting the lives of police officers. One law enforcement expert debunked claims by the gun prohibition lobby that these semiautomatic firearms – which function identically to grandpa’s Remington or Browning shotgun he used to hunt ducks and geese – are “the weapons of choice” of criminals.

I can tell you that the claim that AK-47s or something called an ‘assault weapon’…is widely used by criminals, isn’t true and never has been true. The buzz-phrase became “you don’t need an assault rifle to hunt ducks,” when any hunter could tell you that it’s illegal to hunt ducks with a rifle, anyway, while any gun rights activist will note that the Second Amendment is not about duck hunting, and that “It’s the Bill of Rights, not the Bill of Needs.” Next up was the so-called “.50-caliber Sniper Rifle,” which gun banners portrayed with the proper degree of paranoia as the gun terrorists would use to bring down passenger jets. There has never been a single recorded incident of such magnitude, and according to Wikipedia, “the ViolencePolicyCenter is only able to document 4 actual uses of .50 BMG rifles by criminals.” Now, VPC’s Tom Diaz, who has made a career demonizing different firearms, is now going after a class of large-caliber handguns developed solely for big game hunting (thus deflating another myth of the anti-gun lobby, that handguns are designed only for shooting people). Like the terms “assault rifle” “plastic handguns” and “sniper rifle,” Diaz has invented a slur term for the huge handguns, dubbing them “vest busters.” This alludes to the claim that bullets fired from such handguns will penetrate soft body armor worn by police officers. It is no accident that every time the gun ban lobby launches a campaign to ban one type of gun or another, it camouflages the campaign with claims that “it’s to protect children” or “it threatens the safety of law enforcement officers.” Yet the VPC even acknowledges that handgun bullets do not constitute a threat to police wearing bullet resistant vests.

During the 1990 to 1999 period, 20 law enforcement officers were killed by gunshot wounds as a result of rounds penetrating their body armor. All of these rounds were fired from rifles.

Sadly, Michael Steele, former Maryland lieutenant governor and now head of the Republican National Committee, has also fallen for the mantra of gun prohibitionists. He has also alienated millions of gun owners – an important “base” voting bloc for Republicans – by stating, “What do you need an assault weapon for, if you’re going hunting? That’s overkill.” Steele exhibited a horrid ignorance of competition shooting, along with the increasing use of AR-15 type rifles for varmint hunting and predator control, especially in the West, by a new generation of shooters brought up with such rifles. According to the Associated Press and Seattle Times, Congressional Democrats currently have little interest in pushing gun control, and Steel should follow their lead. Don’t sucker for the new campaign to demonize a class of guns. In a society that condemns racial or religious bigotry, anti-gunners should not get a pass by practicing social bigotry against firearms, and the people who own them. Considering the racist origins of gun control, one would think that new attempts to demonize specific firearms might be met with the same disgust we would feel about demonizing specific classes of people.

[PubliusMM]

“...and that “It’s the Bill of Rights, not the Bill of Needs.””

Yep, that’s correct. And, therefore, all the Anti-gunners should just shut up. I don’t NEED to justify why I own my firearms. And, I don’t have to demonstrate any sort of NEED in order to possess my firearms. Such possession is a RIGHT guaranteed to me, and such right is journalized in the Second Amendment to the Constitution. It is concise; it is succinct; it is unambiguous.

[bmwcyle]

What do you need an assault weapon for, if you’re going hunting?

North American Rinos?

[Charles Martel]

Yea, but man have these guys convinced me to buy a lot of cool stuff over the years.

Funny how that works. There was a thread yesterday linked to a YouTube video that ran the firearm purchase numbers and, for sake of comparison, noted that in 2008, Americans bought enough guns to equip the armies of China and India combined.

[Obamageddon]

Dump Steele

[Sender]

Don’t forget “cop-killer bullets”, another fantasy term recently revived by AG Eric Holder.

[MountainDad]

Time for me to brouse through the Heckler & Koch brochure some more.

[InABunkerUnderSF]

Now, VPC’s Tom Diaz, who has made a career demonizing different firearms, is now going after a class of large-caliber handguns developed solely for big game hunting...

The other thing the VPC and Brady people are trying to demonize is the FN 5.7 mm with its "armor piercing cop killer bullets".

With a bullet weight of just 40 grains and Muzzle Energy of just 313 foot pounds, less than the 323 foot pounds of a typical 115 grain fmj 9mm round and well short of the 434 foot pounds of a 125 gran 9mm+p JHP corbon bullet, the 5.7 "Duty Round" may penetrate armor but lacks adequate stopping power for personal defense. With a very flat trajectory it would probably make a great target pistol though.

The other thing it has going for it is a 20 round magazine - and a price tag of only $1230.24!

[CPOSharky]

A friend was in the same position about that long ago and all the remote AF station had was M-1 Carbines.

Practically usless for anything larger than a woodchuck.

[Pistolshot]

Yes, big bore handguns can be necessary in Alaska.

Trophy bear (killed in self defense).This man works for the US Forest Service in Alaska .

He was out deer hunting last week when a large grizzly bear charged him from about 50 yards away. The guy emptied his 7mm Magnum semi-automatic rifle into the bear and it dropped a few feet from him. The big bear was still alive so he reloaded and shot it several times in the head.

The bear was just over one thousand six hundred pounds. It stood 12' 6' high at the shoulder, 14' to the top of his head. It's the largest grizzly bear ever recorded in the world.

Of course, the Alaska Fish and Wildlife Commission did not let him keep it as a trophy, but the bear will be stuffed and mounted, and placed on display at theAnchorage airport to remind tourists of the risks involved when in the wild.

Based on the contents of the bear's stomach, the Fish and Wildlife Commission established the bear had killed at least two humans in the past 72 hours including a missing hiker.

The US Forest Service, backtracking from where the bear had originated, found the hiker's 38-caliber pistol emptied. Not far from the pistol were the remains of the hiker. The other body has not been found.

Although the hiker fired six shots and managed to hit the grizzly with four shots (the Service ultimately found four 38 caliber slugs along with twelve 7mm slugs inside the bear's dead body), it only wounded the bear and probably angered it immensely.

The bear killed the hiker an estimated two days prior to the bear's own death by the gun of the Forest Service worker.

Think about this: If you are an average size man; you would be level with the bear's navel when he stood upright. The bear would look you in the eye when it walked on all fours!
To give additional perspective, consider that this particular bear, standing on its hind legs, could walk up to an average single story house and look over the roof, or walk up to a two story house and look in the bedroom windows.

[DuncanWaring]

There was a thread yesterday linked to a YouTube video ...

Got a handy reference to that one?

[absolootezer0]

What do you need an assault weapon for, if you’re going hunting?

never seen a pack of coyotes, have you? an AR15 is just what the doctor ordered

[mad_as_he$$]

The new proposed AWB has a clause that says that any gun ever used by the military will be outlawed. So here's on for all the Second Amendment is for hunting types. The military uses Remington 700 series weapons as the basis for sniper weapons. REMINGTONN 700’s WILL BE ILLEGAL WHEN IT PASSES!!!

Oh and Michael Steele is a first order JACKA$$!

[DuncanWaring]

Such possession is a RIGHT guaranteed to me,...

With emphasis on the word "guaranteed", not "granted".

[Ditter]

OMG! What a bear! We have been bear hunting in British Colombia and I have seen how fast these guys can move. If you didn't see him coming and be ready to shoot, he could be on top of you so quick.

[bruoz]

The term “assault weapon” was fabricated by Congress to define and ban the production of a class of semiautomatic firearms with a pistol grip and detachable magazine and/or a folding or collapsing stock, bayonet lug or a flash suppressor.

An “assault rifle” is a term used for military rifles that may or may not have the features listed above but also have a selective fire capability that would make them machine guns under federal law.

BTW, a unmodified SKS at the moment is neither.

[smithandwesson76subgun]

I think that the M1 referred to was a M1 carbine with 15 round magazines. .30 carbine is more like a pistol round, about a .357 magnum.

[Dead Corpse]

meh... Whatever.

[Pistolshot]

A number of years ago on The American Sportsman, there was a Polar Bear hunt with some well known country singer. He was carrying a 338 Win Mag, while his Inuit guide was carrying an old Hawken black powder in 50 cal. There was some joking about it.

They found a reasonable trophy bear to take and the singer proceeded to shoot. It was a good shot as the camera showed the hit about shoulder high. Problem is it only made the bear angry and he charged the crew.

The shooter went to chamber a second round and jammed the rifle. The camera crew was backing away in panic, and the guide calmly raised his Hawken, fired, and dropped the bear at their feet.

[KeyLargo]

Posted: Wednesday, 04 March 2009 8:03PM

Shooting At Gun Store, Chief Baing On The Case

by Bob Roberts

Chicago WBBM Newsradio 780

A would-be thief allegedly picked the wrong store to hold up in Waukegan.

A gun shop.

Waukegan Police Cmdr. Wayne Walles said police have reviewed security video, talked with witnesses and staff at Schrank’s Smoke ‘n Guns Shop, 2010 Washington St., and can only conclude that an as-yet unidentified man was trying to rob the store.

“The subject went behind the counter and became engaged with a store clerk in a verbal altercation that turned physical,” he said. “At one point the store clerk produced a pistol and fired at the subject, striking him twice in the chest and once in the leg.”

A gun shop employee also suffered a graze wound, but when police arrived, the clerk and several others in the store still had guns trained on the alleged thief.

Waukegan Fire Department paramedics transported the man to Vista West Medical Center, but a Flight for Life helicopter transferred him almost immediately to Lutheran General Hospital, in Park Ridge, where he was undergoing surgery as of 6 p.m.

The Smoke ‘n Guns Shop’s employees carry weapons openly and police said the owner is a marksman who teaches shooting classes.

As of 6 p.m., Waukegan Police Chief William Biang (like “bang”) and other top officials were conferring with prosecutors to determine what charges, if any, to place. Police refused to identify anyone involved, pending a decision.
http://www.wbbm780.com/Shooting-At-Gun-Store—Chief-Baing-On-The-Case/3962344

[TXnMA]

Steel and Powell, I'll buy as RINOS. However, I have never seen anything from J.C. Watts that made me view him as anything other than a solid conservative.

If you have any evidence that J.C. Wattts is a RINO, post it -- or retract your statement -- publicly, here on FR. (Or did you include Watts simply because he, too, is black...?)