[tacticalogic]

Maybe you missed this - "Every transitional fossil candidate has both proponents and doubters even among evolutionary “biologists and paleontologists.” "

I saw it. Without any specifics, it looks to be an exercise in "glittering generalites". Any point of disagreement can be counted in the "doubt" column. It's like playing games with statistics.

[GLDNGUN]

I saw it. Without any specifics, it looks to be an exercise in "glittering generalites". Any point of disagreement can be counted in the "doubt" column. It's like playing games with statistics.

Why is that evolutionists can't agree on something basic like, oh, HOW EVOLUTION WORKS, and when that's pointed out they try to pass it off as something inconsequential.