[GLDNGUN]

I saw it. Without any specifics, it looks to be an exercise in "glittering generalites". Any point of disagreement can be counted in the "doubt" column. It's like playing games with statistics.

Why is that evolutionists can't agree on something basic like, oh, HOW EVOLUTION WORKS, and when that's pointed out they try to pass it off as something inconsequential.

[tacticalogic]

Why is that evolutionists can't agree on something basic like, oh, HOW EVOLUTION WORKS, and when that's pointed out they try to pass it off as something inconsequential.

Because if scientists have to agree on every detail of how something works before they can start working on what it does we'd still be stuck arguing about exactly how things like molecular bonds work and there wouldn't be any such thing as the study of chemistry. It's a good way to do things if you're objective is to bring research to a screeching halt.