Posted on 03/04/2009 4:22:26 AM PST by Kaslin
As Congress continues to deliberate energy and global warming bills, President Bushs new climate initiative has altered the debate, at least at the international level. Clearheaded analysis and accurate information is essential or narrow political and economic interests could run roughshod over consumers.
The recent Coal is filthy ad campaign underscores this danger. Featuring misleading claims about pollution from coal-fired electrical generating plants, it urged citizens to tell government officials, No more filthy coal plants.
But the Coalition wasnt another gaggle of environmental pressure groups, like those listed on its CleanSkyCoalition.com website. It was a cabal of natural gas companies, led by Chesapeake Energy of Oklahoma. Their goal wasnt helping Americans get clean skies and live longer. It was fattening corporate wallets.
The cabal hoped new laws would make it harder to build more coal plants, or retrofit old ones to meet tougher air quality standards. Utilities would have to switch to natural gas, supplies would tighten, prices would surge, and Coalition partners would get rich.
Every $1 increase in natural gas prices costs US consumers another $22 billion a year for heating, air-conditioning, food, consumer goods and services many of which use gas for energy or raw materials says the Energy Information Administration. Indeed, consumers paid $140 billion more in 2006 for gas and electricity than they did in 2000 an extra $1900 a year for every family of four.
That hit poor families especially hard, and the US manufacturing sector lost 3 million jobs.
Chesapeake has 9 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of proven gas reserves. That sounds like a lot, but US demand for natural gas has outstripped domestic production since 1985, forcing us to import the difference, largely from less than friendly countries and in competition with other nations. Substituting gas for coal-fired electricity would exacerbate these problems.
Geologists say the US Outer Continental Shelf could contain 420 Tcf enough to meet current demand for 15 years. But over 85% of these areas are off limits to drilling. Onshore gas resources face similar obstacles. And eco purists want to keep it that way.
Electricity provides 40% of the energy we use, and the United States will need 100,000 megawatts of new electricity by 2020, according to analysts. Conservation and efficiency programs would reduce demand somewhat. But growth in population and technologies that use electricity mean we will need every available source: gas, nuclear, hydroelectric, wind, biofuels, waste-to-energy and coal. Right now, coal generates half of our electricity, and there are no viable alternatives in the near term.
The ads and environmental group websites say coal-fired power plants are responsible for scary-sounding amounts of air pollution. The facts tell a different story.
Between 1970 and 2004, the US population grew by 40% its Gross Domestic Product by 187% miles traveled by 171% electricity consumption by 115% and coal burning by 80 percent. And yet, during this period, aggregate air pollution was cut in half, thanks to improved efficiency and pollution control, air quality expert Joel Schwartz points out. New rules require large additional reductions over the coming years that will eliminate most remaining power plant emissions by 2017.
Coal-fired power plants are now the primary source of US mercury emissions, not because their emissions are large, but because the real sources (incinerating wastes and processing ores containing mercury) have been eliminated. America now accounts for only 2% of global mercury emissions, and new EPA rules require a further 70% reduction from power plants over the next decade, Schwartz says.
Total air pollution now poses no significant health risks, even for children. (Asthma rates have risen as air pollution fell, so pollution cannot be a factor.) Moreover, coal-generated electricity costs much less per kilowatt hour than alternatives leaving families with more money for nutrition and healthcare.
In 1900, the world supported 56 billion human life years, notes climatologist John Christy: 1.6 billion people times a 35-year average life span. Today it supports 429 billion life years: 6.5 billion people times a 66-year average life span and they live far better than anyone in history.
The reason: energy, primarily fossil fuels. And in exchange for this incredible progress if fossil fuels really are the primary cause of global warming we have had a net increase in average global temperature, over the past 100 years, of about 1 degree F. (As a percentage of Earths atmosphere, carbon dioxide emissions from US coal-fired power plants equal the thickness of a single human hair on a football field.)
The Kyoto Protocol would compel the United States to slash CO2 emissions over 20% by 2012 to reduce average global temperature increases by 0.2 degrees F by 2050. Current congressional bills would bring even fewer environmental benefits.
If the pervasive misinformation exemplified by the Chesapeake ad campaign is used to justify global warming legislation, Congress may well enact something like the Sanders-Boxer bill, which a new MIT study says would impose a tax-equivalent of $4,500 annually on every family of four by 2015.
These congressional experiments on constituents mandates, cap-and-trade, and other pork-laden bills must be corrected before real damage is done.
cap-and-trade equals trap-and-enslave
?????

Climate Research NewsClick on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
Ping me if you find one I've missed.
So does good information if combined with a misguided philosophy of the proper role of government.
As always follow the money.
“Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket.” - 0bama in 2008
Thanks for the info. I was wondering who was behind that unatributed “no such thing as clean coal” ad on TV last night.
PRESIDENT BUSH??? What did he do now?
Or do these "journalists" feel bad about never referring to him as president for the past 8 years and are now planning to rectify that by slipping his name in there to confuse the masses, leading them to believe it is all Bush's fault?
slave
This part of the equation is already in place.
The producers in this country are already slaves to those who are not. IOW our labor and effort subsidize to a degree everyone on the dole whether state or Federal.
Secondly, Government, local state and federal, is doing the taking, giving and subsidizing, and therefore we are their slaves as well.
A forgotten and very large segment of society has through legislative and thus quasi legal means found themselves on the receiving end of government largess, not necessarily condsidered the dole, but nevertheless, just the same.
This 40 plus percent of Americans are those who either do not contribute to the maintenance of this country, throught the income tax, or worse, are on the receiving end of the system through tax rebates though they contribute zip zero nada.
These folks will be eternally and perpetually, at odds with the producers in the country and the means the producers use to produce, and are guaranteed votes for the liberal progressive, socialist, leftist bleeding heart policies of the other side of the election process.
One can quite easily see, as the magic poverty threshold is continually raised and more and more of the population join those being fed housed clothed tv’d, transported, medicated and generally cared for by the producers rather than themselves that the pendulum will if not already swing so far that election outcomes will be a foregone conclusion.
The end will begin if it has not already done so with the producers crying foul, and rising up to stop the slavery they have been saddled with. It is an untenable system where the government is able to steal what has not been yet produced, and at the same time through neglect, mismanagement, evil design, corrupt politicians, power mad groups and individuals, so easily destroy the life savings of a nation of responsible law abiding people
The time for Revolution of thought, principle, common sense, common law, Natural law, and principles for which our Founding Fathers and each succeeding generation have fought and died for receive a rebirth to the extent that they are never again forgotten. OK, that goes beyond the ability of mankind, Each generation is tasked with the maintenance of freedom and liberty, to the extent they are willing to except the slavery of their various governments.
The oath I took in 1966 as an officer in the USAF is to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies foreign and domestic, and bear true faith and allegiance to the same. The oath does not mention any branch of government local, state, or federal, it mentions no human being, it is based entirely on principles and rights enumerated in the founding documents of this great nation.
Those principles are embodied in the freedom and liberty that has been preserved and protected by the blood of patriots, who, were they are allowed to speak, would loudly condemn what is now taking place in this nation at the expense of those who have gone before, those now here, the future generation yet unborn, and the Constitution itself.
Thank you very much for your service.
Since at least the 60s there has been this fundamental sense that we no longer should play by the “rules” which means, to me, the laws.
This “No Rules Just Right” popular meme is so ingrained it now seems to apply to the Constitution itself. IMO this is intentional. It is an important part of the left’s agenda.
The deconstruction of America must include destroying the citizens’ belief in following the laws until the laws are changed. Now we don’t even expect our elected representatives to act “constitutionally.”
We just do what we “feel” is right and ignore those silly old written laws. We reach “consensus” and we don’t necessarily care about accuracy or legality.
Sigh.
Amen! I would say much more but it is off to work after four hours of preparation. Thanks again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.