Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PurpleMan

“The British Mandate was The Balfour Declaration of 1917... “given to the Arabs.”

I would think that nearly a hundred years later when there is no Palistinian state, discussion of one would be prudent”

No, because the only purpose is the total destruction of Israel as a nation.

Time changes nothing. Should Mexico be able to have the south west US now? Should discussion of that be prudent? Maybe Russia should be allowed to have some of Alaska now? Would that be prudent?

Those people are Jordanians, and egyptians, from 50 years ago. There never was anything called a “palestinian” - that was the arbitrary antisemitic name given the region by the Romans. Everyone who lived there was sometimes called a “palestinian”, in the 40s there was a jerusalem newspaper “the palestinian post” which was a JEwish newspaper.

the whole thing is a bunch of false premises. they could easily be absorbed by the huge muslim countries around, for that is where they CAME from in the 1st place.


19 posted on 03/03/2009 12:16:44 PM PST by chuck_the_tv_out
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: chuck_the_tv_out

“they could easily be absorbed by the huge muslim countries around, for that is where they CAME from in the 1st place.”

So then, your solution is to have Israel take over all of it and then deport all the Arabs back to “the huge muslim countries around where they CAME from in the 1st place.”

Like that’ll work?


22 posted on 03/03/2009 1:18:25 PM PST by PurpleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson