Do you have children in public school? Homosexuals have invaded the Public schools where they teach values clarification classes.
They have little rainbows in their classroom doors, many schools have prayer rooms for Muslims. But a Christian teacher can be fired for wearing a cross on a simple necklace, if it is seen.
Ever work in a school where the administration has been openly gay?
Ever hear of NAMBLA?
Ever read the story of Lot in the Bible?
Gen 19:1 And there came two angels to Sodom at even; and Lot sat in the gate of Sodom: and Lot seeing [them] rose up to meet them; and he bowed himself with his face toward the ground;
Gen 19:5 And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where [are] the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them.
I can imagine that further effort in getting you to see the destructive nature of Libertarianism is useless, so I give up.
free market economics.
This has worked so well with immoral men at the heads of major banks and corporations, has it not? Until they grab the money and run anyway.
And if my state wants to outlaw sodomy or try to enforce the missionary position then we can deal with that then.
You picked a bad example considering what the Supreme Court did to that state law. I still maintain the unalterable position that Libertarianism and its sister philosophy of diversity, and tolerance always lead to a perverse society.
Do you have children in public school? Homosexuals have invaded the Public schools where they teach values clarification classes.
Which is why I, as a libertarian, do not support the public education monopoly. If you hadn't voted for so much government power over the last 70 years my children would be free to be raised by me, their conservative minded parent and not by a nanny state bureaucratic public school system. How can you argue for such a system and then against the use of the system by those that you supported implementing the system? It reminds me of all the crazy leftists screaming that GWB's administration abused its power, and their response is to call for more government power.
Ever work in a school where the administration has been openly gay?Ever hear of NAMBLA...
I can imagine that further effort in getting you to see the destructive nature of Libertarianism is useless, so I give up.
More silly straw men. You talk about NAMBLA and public schools and then imply that they are libertarian organizations. Yeah, right. That, and other such groups, exist entirely to use government to further their schemes. Libertarians seek to disable government from doing any such things, so that parents can once again make decisions about their children. It is strange but that used to be a conservative principle, back in the days of your youth when the society you grew up in was still moral. Funny that.
This has worked so well with immoral men at the heads of major banks and corporations, has it not? Until they grab the money and run anyway.
Oh, so you don't support free markets. You would rather continue with the state managed ones we have now, and by the way which the above "immoral men" operated under. That is what always makes me laugh. The Left loves to berate the "free market" for any failure or abuse that comes along, and yet there hasn't been any actual free market in this nation for years. But, regardless, just how can you call yourself a conservative and call for state run markets, otherwise called socialism? Has so-called "conservatism" fallen so far that laissez faire is now even despised? And people wonder why the GOP and other "conservative" groups find it hard to be successful.
You picked a bad example considering what the Supreme Court did to that state law. I still maintain the unalterable position that Libertarianism and its sister philosophy of diversity, and tolerance always lead to a perverse society.
Maintain it all you want, but you are wrong. The current immoral and perverse society came about all under Republicrats. First you say that the "free market" that isn't free but instead run by non-libertarians is proof that free market economics are a bad idea. And now you say that society under statist morality laws is proof of the evils of libertarianism. Every time the statist philosophies fail its opponents get blamed. Very typical.
And, btw, there is nothing libertarian about tolerance. In a libertarian society I would be free to be as intolerant as I like, because the government would have no power to stop me. In a libertarian society my Church can preach against the sin of Sodom without fear of repression. In a libertarian society my money stays in my pocket and doesn't fund overseas abortions. In a libertarian society my children don't get indoctrinated by public schools run by militant homosexuals and perverts. All of those evils are the fault of people like yourself, who three off the libertarian ideals of the Constitution and adopted statism. Hasn't worked out so well thus far, if you ask me.