Posted on 03/02/2009 8:46:11 PM PST by cc2k
March 2, 2009
President Barack H. Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear Mr. President:
We look forward to working with you as you consider nominees for the federal judiciary. Unfortunately, the judicial appointments process has become needlessly acrimonious. We would very much like to improve this process, and we know you would as well. It is in that spirit that we write early on to suggest two steps your Administration can take to achieve that shared goal.
First, in the beginning of his Administration, your predecessor demonstrated his desire to improve the judicial confirmation process by nominating to the circuit courts two of President Clinton’s previous judicial nominees, Judge Barrington Parker to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, and Judge Roger Gregory to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. It would help change the tone in Washington if your Administration would take the same bipartisan step. Because the last Congress sadly set the modern record for the fewest circuit court confirmations in a President’s final Congress, there are plenty of well-qualified nominees with bipartisan support from whom to choose. For example, Peter Keisler has been praised repeatedly by colleagues in both the public and private sector, Democrats and Republicans, and has earned accolades from major media observers, like The Washington Post. And Judges Glen Conrad and Paul Diamond both enjoyed bipartisan support and have outstanding records on the federal trial bench.
Second, as our Democratic colleagues have emphasized for the last several years, the process of federal appointments is a shared constitutional responsibility. We respect your responsibility to nominate suitable candidates for the federal bench. And as a former colleague, we know you appreciate the Senate’s unique constitutional responsibility to provide or withhold its Advice and Consent on nominations. The principle of senatorial consultation (or senatorial courtesy) is rooted in this special responsibility, and its application dates to the Administration of George Washington. Democrats and Republicans have acknowledged the importance of maintaining this principle, which allows individual senators to provide valuable insights into their constituents’ qualifications for federal service.
We hope your Administration will consult with us as it considers possible nominations to the federal courts from our states. Regretfully, if we are not consulted on, and approve of, a nominee from our states, the Republican Conference will be unable to support moving forward on that nominee. Despite press reports that the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee now may be considering changing the Committee’s practice of observing senatorial courtesy, we, as a Conference, expect it to be observed, even-handedly and regardless of party affiliation. And we will act to preserve this principle and the rights of our colleagues if it is not.
Because of the profound impact that life-tenured federal judges can have in our society, the Founders made their appointment a shared constitutional responsibility. We look forward to working with you to discharge this important duty in the best interest of our country.
Sincerely,
All Republican Senators
Cc: The Honorable Patrick J. Leahy
I won’t flame you. That letter reeked of twice chewed milquetoast.
I wonder if they really sent this letter.
When 0bama says "no" to there request, they will turn and walk away with their tails between their legs.
Did they also send their Christmas wish to 0? Other than the earmarks he’s bribing some of the rinos with.
"Pres__ent Obama, the Kenyan Keynesian.
My FR tagline:
Until I see a REAL C.O.L.B. BC,
he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = without "ID"
I didn’t think there were 41 Republican Senators even counting those three?
Liberal justices retire before 2012? You mean conservative judges right!
> I think there is a procedure in the Senate by which Senators from the state of the judge nominee can block the nomination, also.
I thought that practice was dropped awhile ago?
The conservative justices won’t ... they’re too young. If a liberal retire, Obama has the option to put in a much younger justice.
What was that B HO said before when they supposedly try to sway him?
“I WON!”
Perhaps they should begin letting everyone know how many Bush appointees never saw an up or down vote.
But of course, they would have to discover that bumpy thing running up and down their backs, a spine.
After their performance the last few years, I’m not holding my breath on any of them actually making a strong stand.
P.S. However, should you decide to name a unhinged, far left, openly Marxist nut to the court instead, only about 3 or 4 of us will have the guts to oppose his/her nomination.
Signed,
All Republican Senators
“PRES__ENT” Obama = without “ID”
Nice :)
2012
Oh fine, then the world ends. It figures.
What’s this supposed to do, make him die laughing?
Nice to do something to let him know your’e not a bunch of cows but geez, why don’t you just put on knee pads and crawl down Pennsylvania Ave?
HEy you stupid GOP’ers, RINO’s, and LIB LITES... do just what they did to us... FILIBUSTER EVERY nominee. Until you get nominees that are so conservative they make Reagan look like a MODERATE.
the DEMS made sure that law was there.. and the 14 RINO’s made sure it STAYED THERE .. (thank you RINO McLAME)
Obama’s idea of ‘consultation on judicial nominees’ will consist of Obama inviting a few Republicans to a White House party to convince them to vote in support of Cornel West for Supreme Court Justice.
HEY GOP, forget BIPARTISANSHIP as long as PELOSI and REID CONTROL CONGRESS. Without Congress, OBAMA Will cram his socialistic agenda down every Americans throat whether we like it or not.
They are.
I'd like to remind them that Senator Frist left some of GWB's nominees stranded without Senate votes (for months!), even though they had been approved and voted out of the Judiciary Committee.
Meanwhile, the GOP should use the rules that the DEMS established as acceptable, regarding judicial nominees. Obstruct via abuse of cloture.
Yep. As Dear Leader has already told them, "I won." It sucks to be the losers.
Oh well, maybe if they band together against Rush some more, then Obama will listen to them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.