[Windflier]

I don’t care what Rush’s says.

You said earlier that you are a conservative. If that's so, then I don't understand why you "don't care what Rush says".

Unless, that is, you're speaking of what Rush has to say about Michael Steele. Do you disagree with Rush about that? Do you then agree that Steele's efforts to create a "big tent" for the Republican party is a good thing?

You've got to understand that Rush is a conservative first and foremost, and is only aligned with the Republicans because they've traditionally been the political home of conservatism.

Rush correctly points out that Steele has betrayed his lack of conservative credentials in a time when the Republican party desperately needs to move back to its conservative roots.

Steele now appears to be nothing more than a partisan politico - not a real conservative, which is fundamentally wrong for the leadership of the party at this time.

[fatima]

I don’t listen to Rush on radio.

[wmileo]

"Steele now appears to be nothing more than a partisan politico - not a real conservative, which is fundamentally wrong for the leadership of the party at this time."

Much to Do About Nothing in my opinion. It doesn't make a difference who the RNC Chairman is. Do you really think the Democrats concern themselves with what Wacky Howard Dean says of does?