Posted on 03/02/2009 6:09:02 AM PST by Tolik
Let me know if you want in or out.
Links: FR Index of his articles: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=victordavishanson
His website: http://victorhanson.com/
NRO archive: http://www.nationalreview.com/hanson/hanson-archive.asp
Pajamasmedia: http://victordavishanson.pajamasmedia.com/
His lie about having no earmarks was HUGE....and the press has completely ignored it!
If you speak the truth, have one foot in the stirrup!
Right about the failing nascent obama regime not being honest with America. The objective is clear - to groom this country to use less energy. First by raising the cost of energy, then by discouraging any incentives to seek reward for diligent and economical application of what little energy remains available.
CEOs who receive too much compensation are to be demonized, while the lowly minimum-wage, poorly-educated, failure-to-launch, aimless and unfocused peon is given ever greater rewards for failing, only encouraging more of the same slacker behavior.
For sure, no positive example is coming from the top.
Sure he does. It always starts out something like this- "We inherited from the Bush Administration..."
Or- "Republican tax cuts that the Bush administration..."
Never does he put the blame where it really belongs. Instead he hires the crooks to his staff. That pretty much sums up just how big a bold faced LIAR he really is.
Unfortunately, thanks to MSM who won't inform the public just who really IS responsible for the mess this nation is in, the sheeple will clap and cheer and wait in hopes of getting some money from the government, too stupid to realize it's a tiny fraction of their own money they have already paid to the government to begin with.
Dow -129.19-1.83% 6,933.74
Obama did it! He made the DOW crack through the 7000 point floor everyone thought wouldn't happen till late spring.
Way to go O-stupid.
—great article—points out some unpleasant truth about health care, also—
That would be too much change, the American people want more of the same.
One brilliant plumber, gifted carpenter, or adept auto mechanic does more for the American economy (and our collective values) than a dozen 20-something sociology majors in progress.
^^^^^^
This should be printed on posters and put in every school — especially Schools of Education at universities.
I can't get very sanctimonious about it, though -- I'm about as guilty of it as the next guy.
I like VDH. He’’s a Democrat I’ve read. I’ve assumed that as was George Putnam VDH is of the old style Conservative Democrat genre.
It appears in this article that VDH is focused on a different perspective of BIG Government than Obama and his minions rather then Conservative values which would reduce, or eliminate BIG Government in education.
I’d rather discuss the latter.
We can't. It is verboten to tell the American people that anything is their own damn fault. Or even that they share responsibility for the messes we get into. It must always be someone else's fault.
This can be seen by the fact that when discussing the decline of investments absolutely nobody mentions the gorilla in the corner.
Most Americans have lost 30% to 40% of the value of their 401ks, etc. off the peak value. But this peak value was an illusion, with probably at least 15% to 20% being added by the bubble. IOW, if we had maintained reasonable investment and accounting values over the last 15 years, your 401k would have been worth perhaps $250k a year ago, rather than $350k. Of course, had we done that it would still be worth $250k today, or perhaps a little more, and the economy would still be growing.
Yet the universal assumption among pols and pundits is that if not for the Bush administration, or the misbehavior of Wall Street, or ACRA and Fan and Fred (pick your villain), your 401k would still be worth $350k rather than the $200k it's worth now.
We can't. It is verboten to tell the American people that anything is their own damn fault. Or even that they share responsibility for the messes we get into. It must always be someone else's fault.
This can be seen by the fact that when discussing the decline of investments absolutely nobody mentions the gorilla in the corner.
Most Americans have lost 30% to 40% of the value of their 401ks, etc. off the peak value. But this peak value was an illusion, with probably at least 15% to 20% being added by the bubble. IOW, if we had maintained reasonable investment and accounting values over the last 15 years, your 401k would have been worth perhaps $250k a year ago, rather than $350k. Of course, had we done that it would still be worth $250k today, or perhaps a little more, and the economy would still be growing.
Yet the universal assumption among pols and pundits is that if not for the Bush administration, or the misbehavior of Wall Street, or ACRA and Fan and Fred (pick your villain), your 401k would still be worth $350k rather than the $200k it's worth now.
GOOD
BTTT
Me too, I have been paying into SS since my first job at 17 years old. Almost 56 now so that is 38 years of work. I know that I could put in another 10 years or so to 67, not 62 like is available now, but I would be pissed if they changed it on me. Most of my friends are taking SS at 62, if you do the math, you get alot more then if you wait and get the higher amount at 67.
I have mostly been self employed so have had to make my own investments for retirement, now half of what I have saved for 30 years is wiped out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.