Posted on 03/01/2009 4:35:14 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Thanks for the clarification. I knew that the “anchor baby” could claim citizenship immediately, and that his status won’t stop his parents from being deported (and him with his parents). However, I thought that at 18, when the “anchor baby” has the right to return to the U.S., he could immediately bring his parents in; I’m glad to hear that that is no longer the case, and that he has to live in the U.S. for 10 years before he can apply to have his parents become U.S. residents.
You’re right that I assumed that the pre-1996 rules were in effect; I had a friend in college that was a U.S. citizen by virtue of having been born in the U.S. when his parents were in college (his parents had student visas), and he was filling out the paper work to bring his parents over. It was back in Fall 1993 or Spring 1994, before the 1994 elections brought the GOP into power, and I guess he was lucky he got all that done before the law changed.
“I fully understand why you don’t want to address an issue you have turned upside down (anchorbabies). I do hope you will read longtermmemory’s post to you, phantom.”
Being from Tennessee, I would think they’d have taught you better manners.
We in the South reserve our best manners for those who deserve them. You fail
Yawn.
So has there been a time of getting folks used to the issue (giving it legs) and then bringing them to some further realization?
Sounds like it to me. No wonder so many are now trying so vociferously to shoot it down.
Now, after ramming through a porkulus which threatens the very solvency of the nation, I am convinced the Democrats saw this as their greatest opportunity to end the Constitutional Republic and slide in a full socialist oligarchy fashioned to look like what it never can be, a real representative government.
We The People were the failing sovereigns of this Constitutional Republic so long as the Constitutional contract was not completely abrogated. Oh, to be sure, things like the Federal Reserve and the IRS, etc. have been abrogations of the terms of the contract. But with the advent of this Kenyan Klown and his posse, We The People have been pissed upon by the abrogation of our Constitutional contract by Congressional branch of the dying Republic (Congressional agents purposely failed to vett this bastard and signed documents claiming he was eligible when they had not substantiated that, and the Speaker of the HOuse in joint session in January '09 prevented any challenge to the receiving of the electoral votes) AND ignored by the Judicial branch of the Fed by refusing to use common sense and allow We The People to challenge and demand the minimum proof of this Kenyan bastard's eligibility to be sworn in.
The demonic game has been to play exceptions, such as do not allow objections to arise in joint session, and 'failure to have standing' in the federal judiciary to demand the candidate prove he is eligible to be on the ballot, much less be sworn in TWICE by a pinkneyed little twerp playing chief justice of a subpreme court.
The federal oligarchy isn't biuding their time before exposing the freaud, they have embraced the affirmative action fraud like the Quislings they are!
They federal employees have ended the Constitutional Contract and established the rule of federal oligarchy. All that remains is the further consolidation of their control via raising taxes to punitive levels and establishing a police-state domestic army to enforce their orders upon the sheeple who allowed themselves to be usurped via vote fraud and inattention to their sovereign's responsibilities in electing honest representation.
When 95% of a race votes for a candidate because of his race regardless of his political persuasions, We The People we assassinated by fellow voters.
Welcome to the Democrat's new world of Amerika, the Federal Oligarchy, Constitutional Republic hasbeen mutated to socialist paradise of national insolvency.
Donofrio holds the same opinion, but he would be SOL if Obama Sr' was not Junior's daddy. We had a dust-up on his NBC blog where he cracked on me for pursuing Obama's birth certificate.
Leo stated to me that he doesn't wish to remove Obama from office. Yes, you heard me right.
Based upon that argument -- which I agree with -- why can't these two pages from his mom and dad's 1964 divorce be used in lieu of the COLB as prima facia evidence? It identifies BHO's biological father and is a court record ...
>>>Leo stated to me that he doesn’t wish to remove Obama from office.
Threats?
He means that he, PERSONALLY, does not want to be the one who becomes known as the Man who dethroned a King.
Once he’s been ruled ineligible, he is not the President or a Senator, and therefore ALL SS protection STOPS!
I meant, was Donofrio threatened.
Well, for starters, Stanley Ann’s signature was abolutely FORGED.
ABSOLUTELY.
If her signature was forged, and those aren’t real divorce papers, maybe Obama Sr. had had his VISA revoked due to getting her pregnant since he was already married.
(Sorry, I had to post that.)
He probably feels threatened.
This article deserves to be reposted. OFTEN. REPEATEDLY. FREQUENTLY.
This is the single best article I have read regarding the issue of Barack’s Daddies citizenship and just exactly what it means!
I can’t believe I missed this one the first time around!!!
> “I always thought that was written because since these men were creating the United States, none of them could have been born in it.”
.
What they were creating, via the constitution, was a new Government for those previously united states.
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.