Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: svcw

He really didn’t repudiate him. More of Steffy just wanting to talk about republican back biting. As for the rest of what Cantor said, let me paraphrase:

bla bla bla bla bla, every one hopes the president succeeds. Bla bla bla.


31 posted on 03/01/2009 9:51:17 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: DManA
“bla bla bla bla bla, everyone hopes the president succeeds. Bla bla bla.”

Followed out logically...does that mean he supports the Socialistic Coup Obama is attempting?

Dear Republican leadership, GOP Etc.;

“LEAD, FOLLOW, OR GET THE HELL OUT OF THE WAY”

42 posted on 03/01/2009 9:56:50 AM PST by 444Flyer (Don't beLIEve Obama.............................Never give up, never give in, never give out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: DManA

Yep the bipartisan thing really got McCain far, didn’t it?

In any case, I’m happy to see so many Freepers waking up to the truth. The GOP has been coopted by demrats. And the demrats will not allow RINOs running it to cede it back to conservatives—even if they wanted to.


114 posted on 03/01/2009 10:44:30 AM PST by dools007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: DManA
A bit of a tempest in a teapot. So Cantor gave a clumsy answer. Someone with Reagan's skills would have said something like,
"It is not about our party or theirs. It is not about wishing policies to succeed or fail. Good policies will succeed and bad policies will fail, no matter what anyone wishes. The real question is, are we helping the American people to succeed? Will passing on our massive debt to our children and grandchildren help them be successful? The policies of the current administration, while they may temporarily profit some of us now, will ultimately fail our children and grandchildren."
We may not have anyone with Reagan's ability to turn questions into teaching opportunities. Part of Reagan 's success was because he was there to do something rather than be something (be president, be popular with the Washington insiders). Likewise, Obama is there to do something (in his case, advance the cause of socialism). This is more dangerous than Bill Clinton, who was there to be popular and to be president because being president was cool.

We need someone who can communicate well but I am not sure what good it does to parse everyone's words and condemn anyone who cannot speak as well as Reagan could. It will be a miracle to find one Reagan or Thatcher. To expect every politician to be another Reagan is folly. That does not mean we passively accept it whenever anyone gives a poor answer or accept compromisers like McCain as the norm. But if we attack Republicans every time one gives a clumsy answer, we will have little time to do anything else.

125 posted on 03/01/2009 11:04:37 AM PST by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson