First think of how you felt when I berated some other poster. Then think how I felt when I saw other posters berating Cantor. I wasn't talking about "posters."
I was talking about one poster who did not berate Cantor, just pointed out facts.
The problem you have with posters berating Cantor you will have to take up with them.
Sorry I missed your posts back to me until now, I was busy.
Oh and FreeReign doesn't have free reign???
Now that right thar is irony!
: > )
I wasn't talking about "posters." I was talking about one poster who did not berate Cantor, just pointed out facts. The poster didn't post the facts. All the poster had to do was check the transcript.
From Rush's website, Rush says Cantor agrees with him.
Rush:Now, it starts out, Sargent wants to know if I agree that what Eric Cantor said on Sunday with George Stephanopoulos was a repudiation of my notion that I want President Obama to fail; and I wrote back and I said, "You've got it wrong. What you need to do is check the misleading information on the ABC website." I said, "Check the show transcript against what George Stephanopoulos posted on his website and you'll see that on the show itself George did not define my remarks as they appear on the website. Cantor actually agreed with me in his full answer, re: policy." So, in other words, the website for This Week with George Stephanopoulos is where everybody got the news that Eric Cantor had "repudiated" me, and they put the transcript of the show on the website up inaccurately. The transcript of the show leaves out all of the Rush qualifiers about hoping to fail. Cantor's answer was essentially, policy-wise, to agree with me. So I wrote him back I sent him the transcripts. I sent him the website, what it was reported, and the transcript of the show, and I asked him to add this.
Link