Replies

KerenMarie:

Me:More sematics games from posters who don't get it.

If it was "perfectly clear" to you, I don't see why you would call it "sematics games" and say the posters "don't get it" which in my opinion is condescending and unnecessary. The poster got it quite well

Listen to the video. Cantor and the Republicans gave Obama a conservative plan for success. Cantor obviously wanted Obama to succeed with that plan. Obama(of course) ignored that plan. Cantor never said that he wanted Obama to succeed with the liberal Democrat plan.

Cantor's comments are being taken out of context using sematics.

Now, you never answered my question: Do you actually think that Cantor in his words was wishing that Obama should succeed with liberal policies?

Yes, some on this thread were perhaps berating Cantor, but he is a public figure.

I believe, those who initiate berating a figure should expect the same treatment in return, regardles of whether the person they are berating is a public figure.

We will have to agree to disagree... and that’s ok.

Cantor did say that he gave Obama a list of ideas. He also said that they were dismissed. Cantor was asked a question... did he, as a Rep, agree with Rush on wanting failure. His answer was no, he did not want obama to fail. I take that on face value. I am not reading any more or any less into what the question was, nor the answer.

And in answer to your question... no, I do not believe that Cantor wants Obama to succeed in his socialism and generational debt. But I also believe that Cantor, like many other ‘Conservatives’ are afraid to come right out and say so.

I believe,(sic) those who initiate berating a figure should expect the same treatment in return, regardles (sic) of whether the person they are berating is a public figure.

Fine if that is your style.

Just pointing out some rules of protocol.

Be a little more discerning in the future please.