If it was "perfectly clear" to you, I don't see why you would call it "sematics games" and say the posters "don't get it" which in my opinion is condescending and unnecessary.To: KarenMarieFirst he says that limited Gov and the private sector is what is gonna get us out of the recession, then he says that he doesnt want Obama to fail.More sematics games from posters who don't get it.
The poster got it quite well
"...limited Gov and the private sector is what is gonna get us out of the recession" and if Cantor wants Obama to succeed, that will never happen because Present Obama is working in the opposite direction.
Yes, some on this thread were perhaps berating Cantor, but he is a public figure.
Most people that got his mistake in saying the opposite of Rush were just correcting him IMO and hoping for more solid conservative repudiation of Obama's socalistic tactics.
Me:More sematics games from posters who don't get it.
Listen to the video. Cantor and the Republicans gave Obama a conservative plan for success. Cantor obviously wanted Obama to succeed with that plan. Obama(of course) ignored that plan. Cantor never said that he wanted Obama to succeed with the liberal Democrat plan.
Cantor's comments are being taken out of context using sematics.
Now, you never answered my question: Do you actually think that Cantor in his words was wishing that Obama should succeed with liberal policies?
Yes, some on this thread were perhaps berating Cantor, but he is a public figure.
I believe, those who initiate berating a figure should expect the same treatment in return, regardles of whether the person they are berating is a public figure.