You make my point, exactly.
Jim Robinson will NOT take a stand against libs.
If he did, his FReepathons would maybe bring in pocket change.
Jim probably has other/better things to do than respond to every post here with his own opinion on the subject, or to direct the Mods to start deleting posts or banning FReepers with whom you, or some other FReeper(s) disagree with.
President Bush, Sarah Palin, Romney, Huckabee, Giuliani, Savage, Hannity, the GOP, there are plenty of things here we sometimes agree or disagree on. Jim's silence (or simply being too busy) on any of these subjects doesn't mean he agrees or disagrees with them.
Heck I don't even know Jim, never met him. That's just my take.
First of all, it is considered polite to ping a freeper when talking smack about him, as you should well know by now, and especially JR when you are picking bones. You are cruising for a good zotting.
Secondly, Libertarians had a rightful place at Reagan's table. It is unthinkable to define Conservatism without them. So if JR is kind enough to give them extra leeway it is probably out of respect in regard to their rightful chair.
It is more likely that Republicans hereabouts have grown so cold to the tenets of Conservatism that many of them now find those tenets offensive. If that is your case, perhaps another forum would be more to your liking.