[Nervous Tick]

There is zero evidence — zero — that this woman was either drunk or stupid, as you assert.

I saw nothing from the text that refuted what the article said about her: she was the victim of an assault, and then the victim of a stupid twit of a cop that couldn’t tell the difference between perp and victim.

If you have any such evidence, produce it.

Otherwise, I think you are firmly establishing yourself as the bona fide fool.

[Valpal1]

Still think the broad is innocent as the driven snow? Personally, I think she is now trying to cash in on the tort lotto. What will you say if the officers win their defamation lawsuit against the tv station?

http://www.the-review.com/news/article/4515802

On June 8, 2007, Steffey was tried and convicted by an Alliance Municipal Court jury of disorderly conduct and resisting arrest for events leading up to her arrest in October 2006.

During that criminal trial, evidence was produced that at the time of her arrest Steffey was under the influence of alcohol and medication and was not the victim of an assault.

Evidence showed that on that day, Steffey had assaulted her niece, who was six months pregnant, and that she had also attacked and choked her teenage nephew.

[Valpal1]

Still think the broad is innocent as the driven snow? Personally, I think she is now trying to cash in on the tort lotto. What will you say if the officers win their defamation lawsuit against the tv station?

http://www.the-review.com/news/article/4515802

On June 8, 2007, Steffey was tried and convicted by an Alliance Municipal Court jury of disorderly conduct and resisting arrest for events leading up to her arrest in October 2006.

During that criminal trial, evidence was produced that at the time of her arrest Steffey was under the influence of alcohol and medication and was not the victim of an assault.

Evidence showed that on that day, Steffey had assaulted her niece, who was six months pregnant, and that she had also attacked and choked her teenage nephew.