[Valpal1]

Still think the broad is innocent as the driven snow? Personally, I think she is now trying to cash in on the tort lotto. What will you say if the officers win their defamation lawsuit against the tv station?

http://www.the-review.com/news/article/4515802

On June 8, 2007, Steffey was tried and convicted by an Alliance Municipal Court jury of disorderly conduct and resisting arrest for events leading up to her arrest in October 2006.

During that criminal trial, evidence was produced that at the time of her arrest Steffey was under the influence of alcohol and medication and was not the victim of an assault.

Evidence showed that on that day, Steffey had assaulted her niece, who was six months pregnant, and that she had also attacked and choked her teenage nephew.

[Natural Law]

"On June 8, 2007, Steffey was tried and convicted by an Alliance Municipal Court jury of disorderly conduct and resisting arrest for events leading up to her arrest in October 2006."

The conviction occurred AFTER the arrest and police misconduct. I don't give a damn what your counter argument is the asshat LEOs had no legal or moral justification to rip the panties off of a still innocent citizen. The "evidence" you cite as exculpatory is still only an allegation.

[monday]

“Still think the broad is innocent as the driven snow?”

Doesn't matter if she is innocent or not. No one deserves to be raped by police. The police cannot win their defamation lawsuit. The station asked for their side of the story and the police refused to give it. The police $uck and taxpayers are going to be left with the bill for their $uckage.