Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Natural Law
The departments must contingent train for every possible, not just probable, scenario and develop a response or reaction plan that needs to be reviewed and approved by legal counsel.

LOL! More guaranteed income for lawyers. The city and the police department will still get sued, the lawyers will still get paid and we will still be stripping stupid/crazy/drunk people naked if they make statements of self harm. This is a sane response to an insane tort system.

But this woman will get paid by taxpayers for being a stupid obnoxious drunk. Wanna bet she blacked out and has no memory of the entire evening and was horrified to wake up naked in a holding cell? Wanna bet she denies ANY contributory responsibility for her predicament?

Insane tort culture + victimhood culture = thugocracy and you think the TLA has no share in it? You're a fool.

145 posted on 02/28/2009 11:39:11 AM PST by Valpal1 (Always be prepared to make that difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: Valpal1

There is zero evidence — zero — that this woman was either drunk or stupid, as you assert.

I saw nothing from the text that refuted what the article said about her: she was the victim of an assault, and then the victim of a stupid twit of a cop that couldn’t tell the difference between perp and victim.

If you have any such evidence, produce it.

Otherwise, I think you are firmly establishing yourself as the bona fide fool.


146 posted on 02/28/2009 11:47:17 AM PST by Nervous Tick (Party? I don't have one anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

To: Valpal1
"But this woman will get paid by taxpayers for being a stupid obnoxious drunk."

No, she will get paid by taxpayers because she encountered a herd of stupid obnoxious cops.

Do you realize that the US Supreme Court held in Bad Elk v. United States, 177 U.S. 529 that it was permissible (or at least defensible) to shoot an officer who displays a gun with intent to commit a warrantless arrest based on insufficient cause. It ruled that (police) officers who executed an arrest without proper warrant were themselves considered trespassers, and any trespassee had a right to violently resist (or even assault and batter) an officer to evade such arrest.

149 posted on 02/28/2009 12:10:10 PM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson