Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Durbin Going After Limbaugh?
The Hill ^ | 02/26/09 | Alexander Bolton

Posted on 02/27/2009 6:11:18 PM PST by dvan

Conservatives ask: Is Durbin going after Limbaugh?

Conservatives fear that Democrats are pursuing a “back door” approach to cracking down on Clear Channel Communications, the media conglomerate that airs "The Rush Limbaugh Show," a favorite among conservatives.

The Senate voted along party lines Thursday to adopt an amendment sponsored by Sen. Dick Durbin (Ill.), the second-ranking Democrat in the chamber, that directs the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to “promote diversity in communication media ownership and to ensure that broadcast station licenses are used in the public interest.”

The measure passed 57-41 without a single Republican vote.

Durbin said his proposal would encourage more women and minorities to apply for radio and TV ownership.

But Sen. Jim DeMint (S.C.), chairman of the conservative Senate Republican Steering Committee, charged the proposal would lead to regulatory pressure on Clear Channel, which owns and operates more than 1,200 radio stations in the United States.

The vote came minutes before the Senate voted overwhelmingly to quash the Fairness Doctrine, a regulation the FCC enforced until the mid-1980s that required radio and TV stations to give equal airtime to conservative and liberal viewpoints.

Democrats have tried several times to revive the Fairness Doctrine, which critics argue would decimate conservative talk radio. Those efforts failed because of vetoes by former Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush.

President Obama has made clear that he does not intend to reinstate the doctrine.

But Republicans aren’t convinced that Democrats have given up on loosening conservatives' grip on talk radio.

“Sen. Durbin’s amendment exposed Democrat intentions to impose radio censorship through the back door using vague regulations dealing with media ownership,” said DeMint.

Sen. John Thune (S.D.), vice chairman of the Senate Republican Conference, said, “I am troubled that as we killed the ‘Fairness Doctrine,’ Sen. Durbin’s amendment brought to life a new threat to talk radio and other arenas of free speech.”

Aides to DeMint said the proposal was an attempt to “muzzle successful syndicated radio program” such as Limbaugh's.

“They’re trying to break up Clear Channel and other successful syndicated radio programs,” said Wesley Denton, a spokesman for DeMint.

Durbin dismissed the charge.

“To argue what I am putting here is a dramatic change in the law, is going to somehow muzzle Rush Limbaugh — that’s not the case,” said Durbin during a floor debate with DeMint.

“No one is suggesting that the law for the Federal Communications Commission [FCC] says that you can give this license to a Republican and this one to a Democrat and this one to a liberal and this one to a conservative.

“When we talk about diversity in media ownership, it relates primarily to gender, race and other characteristics of that nature,” Durbin said.

The Senate voted to append Durbin’s proposal to the District of Columbia Voting Rights Act, which passed the Senate on Thursday afternoon.

Minutes after adopting Durbin’s amendment, the Senate voted 87-11 to adopt an amendment sponsored by DeMint that would prevent the FCC from reinstating the Fairness Doctrine.

Republicans have introduced companion legislation in the House, but Democrats in that chamber are not expected to allow a vote on the bill.

Conservatives fear that forcing stations to make equal time for liberal talk radio would slash profits and pressure radio executives to scale back on conservative programming to avoid escalating costs and interference from government regulators.

Opponents of the Fairness Doctrine argue that liberal talk radio has not proven popular or profitable. For example, Air America, liberals’ answer to “The Rush Limbaugh Show,” filed for bankruptcy in October 2006.

The FCC discarded the policy in 1985 after deciding that it restricted journalistic freedom and “actually inhibit[ed] the presentation of controversial issues of public importance, to the detriment of the public and in degradation of the editorial prerogative of broadcast journalists,” according to a Congressional Research Service report.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: 111th; durbin; durbincensorship; durbindoctrine; fairnessdoctrine; illinois; limbaugh; radio; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
No doubt about it!
1 posted on 02/27/2009 6:11:19 PM PST by dvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dvan

they better wake up its all out WAR


2 posted on 02/27/2009 6:14:14 PM PST by patriotmediaa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan

Stupid question, He is. Are we going to target Durbin? LOts of targets there.


3 posted on 02/27/2009 6:15:04 PM PST by reefdiver (How do you keep the Conservative a Conservative, in Washington DC ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan

Durbin wouldn’t make a pimple on an Elephants arse. He is just another self absorbed politician. Politicians may soon be a rare breed, they can’t legislate so why have them. I am wondering if they are willing to take a pay cut?


4 posted on 02/27/2009 6:31:19 PM PST by JamesA (He who hesitates is lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reefdiver

We need to start digging up dirt on these people and using it effectively. We are entirely too nice and they are playing for keeps.


5 posted on 02/27/2009 6:36:25 PM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dvan

Dirtbag is up to his old trick again.


6 posted on 02/27/2009 6:36:53 PM PST by Ben Reyes (Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JamesA

No question they’ll try.

Should they succeed, they have no clue the kind of firestorm they would unleash upon themselves.

Come to think of it, it would almost be worth it for them to acutally try to implement some form or end around of the fairness doctrine... That would likely short circuit the Obama Revolution in short order.


7 posted on 02/27/2009 6:38:33 PM PST by patriot preacher (To be a good American Citizen and a Christian IS NOT a contradiction. (www.mygration.blogspot.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: patriot preacher

Who’s going to stop them?


8 posted on 02/27/2009 6:39:53 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (Buddy, can you spare a tagline?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dvan

I seem to remember Rush wiping up all the Senate democrats on a dare/bet about a year ago. Something about a letter signed by The Beast and 40 other dems.


9 posted on 02/27/2009 6:53:09 PM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan

Olberman is hysterical about Limbaugh. It is both pathetic and hillarious to listen to him lose it.


10 posted on 02/27/2009 6:58:08 PM PST by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan

One FReeper posted, after the “news” that Obama was against the Fairness Doctrine, that it would be back just another a different name.

Can’t remember which FReeper, but he was right on in his prediction.


11 posted on 02/27/2009 7:27:42 PM PST by KJC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Should this actually get passed...does Rush move to satellite?
12 posted on 02/27/2009 7:39:04 PM PST by texan75010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: texan75010

Sat radio is going down the tubes. Probably will be bankrupt before the end of the year.


13 posted on 02/27/2009 7:45:51 PM PST by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dvan

Easy to see why his parents named him Dick.


14 posted on 02/27/2009 7:55:20 PM PST by b4its2late (Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan
Is Durbin Going After Limbaugh?

Like a homo after a boyscout.

Oh, you said durbin, I was thinking bawney fwank.

My bad...
15 posted on 02/27/2009 8:01:14 PM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan

Durbin is the wicked of the bunch. imo

He’s from Chicago!!


16 posted on 02/27/2009 8:01:59 PM PST by Finalapproach29er (Democrats still want to get Pres. Bush and/or VP Cheney; there might be show trials in 2009.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

We need to start digging up dirt on these people and using it effectively

I live here in Chicago (Bad Smell) Illinois and yes we DO need to start diggin up the dirt on these Pols...Durbin should be 1st, he has got to go!


17 posted on 02/27/2009 8:02:23 PM PST by noobamamama ((We need Blago to start singing...he knows where the bodies are buried))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: patriotmediaa
War usually entails casualties.

On the horizon.

18 posted on 02/27/2009 8:02:55 PM PST by Rome2000 (Peace is not an option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: apocalypto

Olberman is hysterical about Limbaugh. It is both pathetic and hillarious to listen to him lose it.

I think that is just his nature...He is an Idiot!


19 posted on 02/27/2009 8:07:41 PM PST by noobamamama ((We need Blago to start singing...he knows where the bodies are buried))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

That’s exactly been our problem.

These people are evil. They could care less about The Constition, civil liberties, economic freedom. They are self-absorbed dictators who’s been egged on and spoiled by a complicit media. Not until we push back, and push back hard, will they get the message and grow up.


20 posted on 02/27/2009 8:10:58 PM PST by A_Former_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson