NASA Satellite Fails to Reach Orbit
The NY Times was the only source that I found that described what happened in some detail.
HOpefully, some things aren’t meant to be.
Good news for a change.
Awwwwwww what a shame! LOL
>> “My experience is that every time we have a comprehensive new data set, we redefine the field,”
Believe me, I’ve noticed that, hon.
I’m so heartbroken over the loss of your satellite that I think I’ll knock off early today and celebrate.
So they dump fifty tons of carbon in the form of burned rocket fuel into the atmosphere just to get it in orbit to measure our fragile carbon damaged ecosystem. Sure must be nice sucking on that government teat.
Dear Scientists,
Just make crap up. That’s what you do anyway.
“The satellite would have measured carbon dioxide concentrations in unprecedented detail, allowing scientists to track emission sources”
So the Obama Admin. could tax the crap out of them.
At least this way, they can just keep making up numbers instead of having the actual measurements that dispute Global Warming
Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
Ping me if you find one I've missed.
The rocket is a metaphor for the whole carbon scam. Everyone has hope, it lights off and becomes a bright beacon for all to sea and then unceremoniously crashes to the ocean, a false hope.
Darn. And this thing was going to produce so much propaganda, er, uh, data, I mean.
“At present, samples are taken by hand every two weeks at roughly 100 ground stations situated unevenly around the world.”
Yeah. And we don’t like the readings we’re getting right now. :)
Temperature Monitors Report Widescale Global Cooling
Michael Asher - February 26, 2008 12:55 PM
World Temperatures according to the Hadley Center for Climate Prediction. Note the steep drop over the last year.
http://www.dailytech.com/Temperature+Monitors+Report+Widescale+Global+Cooling/article10866.htm
Now they will just have to make stuff up, just like they were going to do anyway.