No. I want you to tell us the truth:
‘1. Do you endorse Meg Whitman as Governor of California?’
Nope. I live in Ohio, and I don’t know much about her.
“2. Do you agree with Mitt Romney’s endorsement of her?”
I’m glad Romney is out there fighting for Republicans, rather than pouting about not being the nominee in 2008. Speaks volumes about his committment to the party.
‘3. Do you believe, since there isn’t a shadow of doubt that the woman is a hardcore liberal, that Romney’s endorsement of her goes to his veracity during the last election, especially in light of his decades-long support for the exact positions she espouses?’
No. I believe Romney is a political ‘realist’ and knows as I do that a Conservative as you or I would define it hasn’t a snowballs chance in hell of winning California. Boxer and Feinstien are Uber Liberal Senators, and completely untouchable politically because of this. Nancy Pelosi is in her ‘spare time’ the longest tenured House Rep from California, and THE Uber Liberal Queen Bee.
You think those three are what? An Accident?
Wow.
I’ll await your succinct, honest responses.
Not a straight answer in the bunch. Why am I not surprised?
“Speaks volumes about his committment to the party.”
The man is in his 60s and part of a famous Republican dynasty family.
If you look at his life you will see the truth of his connection to the republican party and conservatism, it is mostly hostile, and for many years he even renounced the republican party, even when he rejoined after Reagan was gone.