[dirtboy]

Surely you know better than to think I accept long-age uniformitarianism. The point of posting this, like so many other papers and articles I post, is to show that God’s creation is forcing the Evos ever closer to the creationist position.

Which means you cherry-pick the factiod you want while ignoring all the other inconvenient facts. My point EXACTLY about your movement.

[OneVike]

Which means you cherry-pick the factiod you want while ignoring all the other inconvenient facts

As I listen to those of you who profess the things you believe in, I pay attention to the names of the various scientists you claim to get your evidence from. Well these so-called scientists and geologists also claim that humans, especially American humans, are guilty for the cause of global warming.

So, you do the same thing you accuse our side of doing, you cherry pick the ideas of these idiots to get the conclusions you are looking for.

Interesting how we all do that. That is because every person will use what evidence supports our ideas, while ignoring the idiotic portions of the study that are just put in because most scientists and geologists have preconceived ideas they want to prove.

I am still waiting for someone who believes in Darwin's theory of evolution, to ignore any evidence brought forward by any scientist that also supports "Man-made Global Warming" as a fact.

You expect us to not cherry pick, yet you do the very same thing.

[GodGunsGuts]

==Which means you cherry-pick the factiod you want while ignoring all the other inconvenient facts. My point EXACTLY about your movement.

You are quite mistaken. We look at the exact same data, and are forced by the weight of the evidence to reinterpret it. Long-age uniformitarianism is an assumption, not a fact. Thus the Evo assumption of 400,000 years in no way falls under the category of cherry-picked factoids.