Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Contrived Crisis?
Right Bias ^ | Feb. 24, 2009 | Nancy Morgan

Posted on 02/25/2009 6:53:48 AM PST by econjack

Through a series of supposedly random but arguably deliberate chain of events, America is poised to jettison 220 years of a free market system called capitalism, in favor of the tried and failed system of socialism. This writer, and others, are now starting to question how we reached this point.

(Excerpt) Read more at rightbias.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: contrived; crisis; nancymorgan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
This is an interesting thought for discussion.
1 posted on 02/25/2009 6:53:48 AM PST by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: econjack

Recall that just before this “crisis” began, John McCain was leading in the polls.


2 posted on 02/25/2009 6:54:51 AM PST by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

We were run over by a large herd of RINOs.


3 posted on 02/25/2009 6:55:28 AM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
Recall that McCain was also for the bailouts. He picked Gov’t instead of freedom.
4 posted on 02/25/2009 6:56:26 AM PST by BGHater (Tyranny is always better organised than freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
"Recall that McCain was also for the bailouts"

Juan is DEFINITELY part of the problem.

5 posted on 02/25/2009 6:58:26 AM PST by Paladin2 (No, pundits strongly believe that the proper solution is more dilution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: econjack
Chucky (I love a camera) Schumer’s California bank run was part of the porkulus bill. How anyone in government can be so irresponsible without any condemnation is beyond me
6 posted on 02/25/2009 6:59:29 AM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

Obama never would have won the election if the economic crisis did not come along exactly when it did. His supporters recognize this fact, but they stop short of believing that the economy was manipulated in order to elect the Messiah.


7 posted on 02/25/2009 6:59:41 AM PST by Boardwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

A “progressive” income tax combined with public education for indoctrination.


8 posted on 02/25/2009 7:00:45 AM PST by screaminsunshine (f)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

bttt


9 posted on 02/25/2009 7:02:21 AM PST by BenLurkin (Mornie` utulie`. Mornie` alantie`.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack
Exactly! Started with the left-wing demonRats covering for Fannie Mae and ACORN pressuring banks to make obscene loans to people who couldn't possibly afford them.

Must see video from 2004: 'Democrats Defend Fannie/Freddie from Regulation'. Watch it 'til the end. You will not believe it.

"We've been through nearly a dozen hearings where frankly we were trying to fix something that wasn't broke. Mr. Chairman we do not have a crisis at Freddie Mac and in particular at Fannie Mae under the outstanding leadership of Mr. Frank Raines."-Rep. Maxine Waters, 2004

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs


_________________________________________________________

History of Fannie Mae scandal
"Fannie Mae announces its long-awaited restatement, erasing $6.3 billion in profit from 2001 through June 30, 2004."
http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2006/12/07/history_of_fannie_mae_scandal/?page=1
_________________________________________________________

Bailout Politics: The Congressional Dems who enabled this crisis are now being trusted to fix it?
Thomas Sowell, September 30, 2008
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=OWE3OWU3OTExYzNlNTUzMzY2YmJmOWZjMzcwN2M1NjU=
_________________________________________________________

Guilty Party: ACORN, Obama, and the mortgage mess
Mona Charen, September 30, 2008
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=Mzk4MmVkNzA1NGQ2NGRkZjQ2YjNmYjdlODZkMmQ4N2I=
_________________________________________________________

An ACORN Falls from the Tree: A congressional outrage
Ken Blackwell, September 29, 2008
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=N2Y5MTc0ZTAyMmE1Mjk3NGE3OWRiY2FkMjZlN2YxYzc=

10 posted on 02/25/2009 7:02:59 AM PST by ETL (ALL the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack
There is nothing like a good crisis to gain an objective, in this case the presidency. "Keep the crisis going....Raul Emanuel", Saul Alinsky, Eric Holder, Barack Obama, all students of the community organizer, Saul Alinsky...

(Alinsky's Rules for Radicals)

RULE 1: "Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have." Power is derived from 2 main sources - money and people. "Have-Nots" must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)

RULE 2: "Never go outside the expertise of your people." It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don't address the "real" issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)

RULE 3: "Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy." Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)

RULE 4: "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules." If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity's very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)

RULE 5: "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon." There is no defense. It's irrational. It's infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)

RULE 6: "A good tactic is one your people enjoy." They'll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They're doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid "un-fun" activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)

RULE 7: "A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag." Don't become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)

RULE 8: "Keep the pressure on. Never let up." Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)

RULE 9: "The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself." Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists' minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)

RULE 10: "If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive." Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management's wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)

RULE 11: "The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative." Never let the enemy score points because you're caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)

RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)

11 posted on 02/25/2009 7:03:44 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

The Democrats were willing to risk losing the war in Iraq, and the larger war on terror, in their quest for power.

I believe they were also willing to risk the destruction of the entire US economy in their quest for power.


12 posted on 02/25/2009 7:04:13 AM PST by FroggyTheGremlim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Very interesting! Thanks!


13 posted on 02/25/2009 7:05:10 AM PST by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Obama spanked the predatory lenders last night. He made it seem like the banks had forced people to take loans they could not afford.


14 posted on 02/25/2009 7:07:41 AM PST by Boardwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WayneS
We were run over by a large herd of RINOs.

Exactly. I was an economic adviser for Senator Lugar in his first election bid, but I plan to work my butt off to get him out of office in the primaries. All of us need to throw the RINO's out of office..

15 posted on 02/25/2009 7:07:59 AM PST by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: econjack


____________________________________________________________

Media Mum on Barney Frank's Fannie Mae Love Connection:
Democratic House Financial Services Committee Chair promoted GSEs while former 'spouse' was Fannie Mae executive

By Jeff Poor
Business & Media Institute, 9/24/2008

excerpt...

"Frank, who is openly gay, had a relationship with Herb Moses, an executive for the now-government controlled Fannie Mae. The column revealed the two had split up at the time but also said Frank was referring to Moses as his "spouse." Another Washington Post report said Frank called Moses his "lover" and that the two were "still friends" after the breakup.

Frank was and remains a stalwart defender of Fannie Mae, which is now under FBI investigation along with its sister organization Freddie Mac, American International Group Inc. (NYSE:AIG) and Lehman Brothers (NYSE:LEH) – all recently participants in government bailouts. But Frank has derailed efforts to regulate the institution, as well as denying it posed any financial risk."

http://www.businessandmedia.org/printer/2008/20080924145932.aspx
____________________________________________________________

Lawmaker Accused of Fannie Mae Conflict of Interest

By Bill Sammon, October 03, 2008

WASHINGTON -- Unqualified home buyers were not the only ones who benefitted from Massachusetts Rep. Barney Frank’s efforts to deregulate Fannie Mae throughout the 1990s.

So did Frank’s partner, a Fannie Mae executive at the forefront of the agency’s push to relax lending restrictions.

Now that Fannie Mae is at the epicenter of a financial meltdown that threatens the U.S. economy, some are raising new questions about Frank's relationship with Herb Moses, who was Fannie’s assistant director for product initiatives. Moses worked at the government-sponsored enterprise from 1991 to 1998, while Frank was on the House Banking Committee, which had jurisdiction over Fannie.

Both Frank and Moses assured the Wall Street Journal in 1992 that they took pains to avoid any conflicts of interest. Critics, however, remain skeptical.

"It’s absolutely a conflict," said Dan Gainor, vice president of the Business & Media Institute. "He was voting on Fannie Mae at a time when he was involved with a Fannie Mae executive. How is that not germane?

"If this had been his ex-wife and he was Republican, I would bet every penny I have - or at least what’s not in the stock market - that this would be considered germane," added Gainor, a T. Boone Pickens Fellow. "But everybody wants to avoid it because he’s gay. It’s the quintessential double standard."

A top GOP House aide agreed.

"C’mon, he writes housing and banking laws and his boyfriend is a top exec at a firm that stands to gain from those laws?" the aide told FOX News. "No media ever takes note? Imagine what would happen if Frank’s political affiliation was R instead of D? Imagine what the media would say if [GOP former] Chairman [Mike] Oxley’s wife or [GOP presidential nominee John] McCain’s wife was a top exec at Fannie for a decade while they wrote the nation’s housing and banking laws."

Frank’s office did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Frank met Moses in 1987, the same year he became the first openly gay member of Congress.

"I am the only member of the congressional gay spouse caucus," Moses wrote in the Washington Post in 1991. "On Capitol Hill, Barney always introduces me as his lover."

The two lived together in a Washington home until they broke up in 1998, a few months after Moses ended his seven-year tenure at Fannie Mae, where he was the assistant director of product initiatives. According to National Mortgage News, Moses "helped develop many of Fannie Mae’s affordable housing and home improvement lending programs."

Critics say such programs led to the mortgage meltdown that prompted last month’s government takeover of Fannie Mae and its financial cousin, Freddie Mac. The giant firms are blamed for spreading bad mortgages throughout the private financial sector.

Although Frank now blames Republicans for the failure of Fannie and Freddie, he spent years blocking GOP lawmakers from imposing tougher regulations on the mortgage giants. In 1991, the year Moses was hired by Fannie, the Boston Globe reported that Frank pushed the agency to loosen regulations on mortgages for two- and three-family homes, even though they were defaulting at twice and five times the rate of single homes, respectively.

Three years later, President Clinton’s Department of Housing and Urban Development tried to impose a new regulation on Fannie, but was thwarted by Frank. Clinton now blames such Democrats for planting the seeds of today’s economic crisis.

"I think the responsibility that the Democrats have may rest more in resisting any efforts by Republicans in the Congress or by me when I was president, to put some standards and tighten up a little on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac," Clinton said recently.

Bill Sammon is FOX News' Washington Deputy Managing Editor.

http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_story/0,3566,432501,00.html
____________________________________________________________

Rush Limbaugh's "Barney Frank/Banking Queen" parody of ABBA's Dancing Queen:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwVWXN0Pyq4

16 posted on 02/25/2009 7:08:18 AM PST by ETL (ALL the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Barney Frank is the Banking Queen! You can have any house your heart desires...


17 posted on 02/25/2009 7:09:09 AM PST by Boardwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: eCSMaster

That is what my gut tells me. The quest for control, the long term mission of socialism/communism explains it to me. Don’t forget Nikita Kruschev(sp) telling America that “we will bury you from within” or similar.


18 posted on 02/25/2009 7:09:14 AM PST by wxgesr (I want to be the first person to surf on another planet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

And after Sarah’s speech at the convention they had the
momentum of a runaway train. It was over!

And then bam! The financial crisis.


19 posted on 02/25/2009 7:10:08 AM PST by Semper Mark (Communism is Socialism with a gun to your head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ETL
Media Mum on Barney Frank's Fannie Mae Love Connection: Democratic House Financial Services Committee Chair promoted GSEs while former 'spouse' was Fannie Mae executive

.

Anyone recall the Dodd story bout his Irish Island Cottage ?

20 posted on 02/25/2009 7:10:39 AM PST by litehaus (A memory tooooo long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson