[pissant]

No. But conservatives are calling on all patriots, military and non-military to demand that the marxist quisling prove he is a NBC, since the GOP and the Dems did not.

[SolidWood]

How about formenting rebellion to save the Republic? This goes far beyond “politics”.

[anniegetyourgun]

I thought the media considered Keyes to be inconsequential...

[Semper Mark]

WND has reported that there are now two soldiers signed
on as plaintiffs.

The new one is a reservist M.P. on active duty and stationed
in Iraq.

[EternalVigilance]

Ron Moore is as lazy in his "reporting" (hah) as Keith Olbermann. Alan Keyes is not a Republican.

America's Independent Party

He also didn't say that they should refuse orders. He said that Obama should cough up the ten bucks for his real birth certificate because there may be a multitude of ways in which his authority might be called into question if he doesn't prove he's actually constitutionally qualified to be the President of the United States.

These people are such liars. It's all they know how to do.

[TADSLOS]

LOL! The republican party can’t even get out of its own way, much less foment rebellion among the military against Obama.

[Kakaze]

The republicans......no they love power too much to revolt.

Actual conservatives that believe in the constitution,now they just might kick back and kick back hard.

[omega4179]

Barf alert needed! >-o

[Bobalu]

[The Sons of Liberty]

No. But members of the Armed Forces, where every day can be a matter of life or death, have the right to know whether the individual who claims to be "The President" is truly "The Commander in Chief", or a Usurper.

[EternalVigilance]

The excreter of this crapola:

Ron Moore is a freelance writer living in Silver Spring, Maryland with decades of service in the grassroots community as a local union president, union organizer, national AFL-CIO staff, and writer for the A. Philip Randolph Institute. Contact Ron at ron_e_moore@yahoo.com

[DivaDelMar]

The Republicans are an ineffectual group of limp-wristed girly men. They couldn’t foment a rebellion if their lives depended on it. They are impotent, worthless, worse than worthless: They delude the weak-minded into believing they are actually a force for conservatism. That’s a crock.

Face facts folks, we’ve lost the Republic and the “Republicans” cannot possibly provide the channel by which to re-establish it. We’ve got to look to a third party or start our own party.

[Terabitten]

While this may not be a trend, it is noteworthy that the hostility is so openly practiced by those sworn to uphold the Constitution.

Mr. Moore would do well to remember that a) our oath is to defend the Constitution, NOT the President, and that b) our oath requires us to defend the Constitution from both foreign and DOMESTIC enemies.

[GBA]

I read the headline...so where is the story to go with it? I can see that they are somewhat related, but the headline is a serious leap from the story itself.

[Dead Corpse]

Defending the Constitution is now "fomenting rebellion"? If so, so be it.

Let's roll...

[Viking2002]

'Ron Moore is a freelance writer living in Silver Spring, Maryland with decades of service in the grassroots community as a local union president, union organizer, national AFL-CIO staff, and writer for the A. Philip Randolph Institute. Contact Ron at ron_e_moore@yahoo.com '

IOW, the ramblings of another inside-the-Beltway Marxist thug.

[roses of sharon]

“If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin.”

Samuel Adams

[penelopesire]

At least Obama’s eligibility is finally getting some press...LOL. Of course, the paranoid reporter has to create a ‘conspiracy’ in order to combat Obama’s very real conspiring to hide his COLB!

[Canedawg]

The more rebellion against this destructive, unpatriotic administration, the better.

[DTogo]

While this may not be a trend, it is noteworthy that the hostility is so openly practiced by those sworn to uphold the Constitution.

And? It's an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic." Not an oath to the President, a politician or political party.

[Enterprise]

That’s quite a stretch to equate a constitutional right to access the courts to a refusal of orders. And anyway, I would think that a soldier has the right to the knowledge that those above him, including the President, are in the chain of command according to the Constitution. As someone who has sworn to uphold the Constitution, he has a duty to question the qualifications of someone who gives him genuine reason to doubt those qualification.