Posted on 02/23/2009 4:02:18 PM PST by goldstategop
When the Virginia Legislature invited Churchill to address them, he said, Do you not think you are running some risk (by) inviting me to give you my faithful counsel on this occasion? I might easily, for instance, blurt out a lot of things, which people know in their hearts are true, but are a bit shy of saying in public, and this might cause a regular commotion and get you all into trouble.
I apologize in advance for serving up some cold and bitter truths with tonights dinner, but the events in Sacramento of the last few days simply cannot be ignored.
This is not a small or inconsequential matter. This is the biggest tax increase in our states history in the worst economy in a generation one that is aimed directly at the middle-class voters who have been the core of our support for 40 years engineered by Republican legislative leaders and a Republican governor. It is a huge chunk about $1,200 on average out of the discretionary income of every family in this state just as they are struggling to make ends meet.
If the government has run out of money in these difficult times, what makes them think the people havent run out of money also?
We have to discuss this outrage as a party because until we address and redress it, our party will have no credibility to speak on this issue for a decade or more to come. It is this issue more than any other that has defined the binding principle that holds our party together. We may differ on many ancillary issues, but the one thing we have all agreed on is that our government is too big, too inefficient and it costs too much.
Take this proposition away, then what exactly does our party stand for?
Abraham Lincoln reminded the Illinois Republican State Convention in 1858 that a house divided against itself cannot stand.
So it is with political parties.
A political party cannot stand for two opposite principles at the same time.
A party cannot stand for taxpaying families while its leaders impose crushing new taxes on those families.
A party cannot stand for freedom of enterprise when its leaders impose increasingly draconian restrictions on enterprise.
A party cannot stand for fiscal responsibility when its leaders spend and borrow and tax with reckless abandon.
When our party promises one thing and our leaders deliver exactly the opposite, we lose all credibility with the voters and rightly so.
When candidates claim our name, and enjoy our organizational, financial and volunteer resources, we have a right as a party to insist that those candidates abide by certain fundamental defining principles. We have a responsibility to remove them from office when they wantonly violate those principles and sully our name.
Fourteen years ago, this party recalled two sitting Republican legislators because they had voted for Willie Brown for Assembly Speaker, an act that didnt directly affect a single individual in this state.
Fourteen years later, are we going to turn a blind eye to Republican legislators who broke signed promises and voted to hammer California families with an average of more than $1,200 of additional taxes in the midst of the worst recession in a generation?
The Democrats never promised not to raise taxes. We did. And our leaders broke that promise.
The concept of the big tent has always been that however we might disagree over issues such as the right to life, the right to self-defense, degrees of business or environmental, we at least all united in defense of families against the burdens of big government. We were the party of the taxpayers.
Now, in California, we are the anti-taxpayer party so defined by the actions of our own leaders. To consent to those actions by silence is suicide.
It doesnt have to be this way.
Having spent a few months now in Washington, D.C., I can tell you that our Congressional leaders understand this reality. They understand that when our leaders abandoned our principles, our voters abandoned our party.
The Republican Congressional leadership is bound and determined to win back the trust of American voters by returning to our Republican principles.
We saw that leadership in action last week when every single Republican in the House of Representatives stood against the most reckless spending bill in the history of our nation. They rallied behind a Republican alternative that would have lifted the tax burdens on productivity and created twice the jobs at only half the cost of the Democrats spending plan.
In Washington, at least, the Republicans are again acting as the taxpayers party.
And it is working. Last fall, Rasmussen reported that a generic Democratic candidate for Congress had a 16-point advantage over the generic Republican candidate.
Last week, after Congressional Republicans stood firm, the same poll reported that this gap had narrowed to within a single percentage point.
Dont we have a right to insist on the same fidelity among our elected leaders in California?
And dont we have an obligation to enforce that insistence at the ballot box?
Ladies and gentlemen, there is an ebb and flow to politics that weve all seen and felt. Some people call it the political pendulum.
The new Administration in Washington is flush with victory, it is riding high in the opinion polls, and yet Americans are already taking a long, hard look at the policies they are pursuing and are already showing signs of having grave misgivings.
Weve seen this before. Those who remember the administration of Jimmy Carter remember these same policies and what four years of them did to our nation. We had to endure double-digit unemployment and inflation, interest rates over 20 percent, mile-long lines around gas stations, American embassies seized with impunity.
It was hell to go through. But the American people awoke and four years of Jimmy Carter gave us eight years of Ronald Reagan. Looking back, that wasnt such a bad trade, was it?
It was Reagan who then said that, "Our people look for a cause to believe in. He called for a new and revitalized second party, raising a banner of no pale pastels, but bold colors, which make it unmistakably clear where we stand
Lincoln said that if the voters get their backsides too close to the fire, theyll just have to sit on the blisters a while. Our nation has some very painful blisters it is going to have to sit on, but in the next election, our people will indeed be looking for a new and revitalized second party.
But before we can restore our majority, we are going to have to make it unmistakably clear where we stand.
Great parties are built upon great principles and they are judged by their devotion to those principles.
The defining principle of the Republican party has always been summarized in one word: FREEDOM. The closer we have hewn to that principle, the better we have done; and the farther we have strayed from that principle, the worse we have done.
The Republican leadership in the House of Representatives is newly re-dedicated to that principle, and the American people are already responding.
Tonight, the people of California are reeling at the news that the party that had promised to protect them from higher taxes has now socked them with a tax increase so great that it will be felt keenly around every kitchen table from Eureka to San Diego.
They are looking to this, the State Convention of the California Republican Party, for an explanation.
The very first answer we owe them, and the very first step in that long and painful road to Republican redemption must be to repudiate the decidedly anti-Republican policies that have been enacted by our leaders in our name.
And now my fellow Republicans, I leave you with this question: What are YOU prepared to do about it?
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
H said we are the party of the taxpayers. Therein lies the rub. There just aren’t many taxpayers left.
What happens to those Republicans that voted for the tax increase?

You people who voted for this are some DUMB SUMBITCHES!
I will soon be a resident of N.W. Nevada, and be paying income tax in Nevada and sales tax in Oregon.
Californcatestan will lose 100% of what I paid instead of getting 10% more.
Hopefully, an illegal alien needing major health care will replace me.
...”I might easily, for instance, blurt out a lot of things which people
know in their hearts are true, but are a bit shy of saying in public...”
Ah, if only John McCain had had this kind of gumption.
What was it that John told the lady at the political rally
who called obama an Arab and said that she feared him...
(Paraphrasing) You don't have to fear him being your president, he's a good and decent man.
I can not understand why the California Republican Party continues to support Arnold Schwarzenegger. I can only suppose that the rank and file in the Assembly Republican Caucus refused to dismiss Mike Villines this past week because the party refuses to undermine our very liberal governor.
Obviously, simply not supporting the California Republican Party isn't abating their march to the left. It is approaching a point in time where sabotaging their efforts should be considered.
I don’t believe Nevada has an income tax.
What repercussions will Abel Maldo suffer?
He needs to be primaried. Same with Cogdill.
What is the CA GOP thinking? This idiot Maldo bargained a tax increase for an open primary system? An open primary system is a terrible idea and it is of no consequence to average taxpayers.
We have no sales tax in Oregon...
Ed
“A political party cannot stand for two opposite principles at the same time.”
I think this guy has been reading my posts! :)
Just kidding, BUT!
I have been railing against Republicans ARGUING FOR the same principles that the left is.
Reagan shrank the government by ARGUING AGAINST GOVERNMENT!
Reagan decreased taxes by ARGUING AGAINST TAXES!
The universe doesn’t go along with these mamby-pamby conservatives who argue for nothing more than a LESSER DEGREE OF SOCIALISM!
You are for something, or you are against it. In between you find stagnation and rot—cynicism, fear and uncertainty.
We need REAL MEN and REAL GUIDING PRINCIPLES—AND FAST!!!
Sure, IDEALS are impossible for humans to attain—we’re FAR from perfect.
BUT ARE IMPERFECTION IS EXACTLY WHY WE NEED IDEALS AND A VISION TO LIVE UP TO!!!
Envisioning a society that doesn’t need confiscatory taxation is NOT NAIVE—it is EXACTLY what those on the right should be shooting for—IT’S HOW THE RIGHT WILL EVOLVE!
The founders didn’t stop envisioning a TRULY FREE HUMAN when the masses thought them NAIVE and RECKLESS!
IT’S TIME TO STAND UP FOR A LIFE LIVED AS A FREE HUMAN BEING!
THERE IS NO LOFTIER GOAL ON THIS PLANET!
RAISE YOUR AIM, REPUBLICANS!
Fight for what is RIGHT!
Yep, I thought of that already, just like Nevada has no state income tax.
Like Nevadans, you will just have to console yourself with the fact that you have a "Shall issue" CCW state.
PING!
McClintock Ping List.
Please freepmail me if you want on or off this list
State income tax.
Darn, I'll just have to use that extra money to compete in the Silver State Classic.
If only McClintock was the governor.
Golf?
They got the zot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.