[DallasMike]

Then again you don't even understand your own talking points, how can you be expected to understand their rebuttals?

You're correct -- GGG has repeatedly refused to answer questions about his educational and work background. When educated people refute the stupid articles he links to, he calls them all sorts of foul names.

He doesn't understand the articles that he spams, he doesn't understand that the Bible does not contradict science, he does not understand basic logic, and he does not understand rational rebuttuls. But he does know how to call you a believer in "atheist science" and a "worshipper at the Temple of Darwin Cult.

[metmom]

...he doesn't understand that the Bible does not contradict science,...

That's setting the wrong thing up as the absolute standard. Science often contradicts itself.

Until someone can be totally positive, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that science is true, correct, fact, the last word, there's no way that it can be used to be the standard by which everything is measured.

The thinking that science is *right* by default, and Scripture is *wrong* by default when the two are at odds, has no basis at all, nor does it have any precedence that supports it. It's merely a preference based on one philosophical outlook.

[GodGunsGuts]

You should like DallasMike, he will lick Evo boots for a pat on the head. He claims to be a scientist. But like you, he tends to make wild claims not supported by the evidence, confuses basic concepts that even high school earth science students know, will ridicule and disavow fellow Christians to be accepted by the Temple of Darwin, and is not above lying in his endless quest to gain the approval of God-hating atheists and materialists. If you have any self-respect at all, I would imagine you hate lukewarm sellouts no matter which side of the debate they happen to call their own. So I thought I’d present you with a few links to show DallasMike in action:

FYI re: DallasMike

This is the method DallasMike chose to enter the thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2175104/posts?q=1&;page=51#85

Here is where I correct DallasMike’s slander:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2175104/posts?q=1&;page=51#97

Here is where DallasMike confuses inflation with expansion, saying that inflation has been “observed” since 1929! And then uses a link that actually states just the opposite to call the creationist author of the original article a “liar.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2175104/posts?q=1&;page=201#229

Here is where I point out that his own link says just the opposite, namely that inflation is not observed, and was postulated to fix problems with the Big Bang:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2175104/posts?q=1&;page=201#237

But DallasMike keeps posting the same balderdash confusing inflation with expansion. I finally ask Mr. “Scientist” if he knows the difference between inflation and expansion here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2175104/posts?page=245#245

...and here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2175104/posts?page=245#246

And then DallasMike, the great Christian and “scientist” has the audacity to pretend he knew the difference all along:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2175104/posts?q=1&;page=251#257

And then after fraudulantly trying to claim that he knew the difference all along, he repeats the same claim (which he now knows is a lie) all over again further down the thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2175104/posts?page=290#290

This isn’t about whether DallasMike is an OEC or a YEC. If DallasMike were on my side of the debate and I caught him slandering and lying, I would call him on it in a second. If he was a scientist under my employ, I would fire him even faster.

[ColdWater]

You're correct -- GGG has repeatedly refused to answer questions about his educational and work background.

He doesn't need to. His education consists of what he was told in Sunday School at the age of seven and his work background consists solely of posting threads to FR.

[ketsu]

You're correct -- GGG has repeatedly refused to answer questions about his educational and work background. When educated people refute the stupid articles he links to, he calls them all sorts of foul names.

He doesn't understand the articles that he spams, he doesn't understand that the Bible does not contradict science, he does not understand basic logic, and he does not understand rational rebuttuls. But he does know how to call you a believer in "atheist science" and a "worshipper at the Temple of Darwin Cult.

If he wasn't so damaging to the conservative cause, he'd be funny in a pathetic kind of way.